Nuclear Races Rush

Athlete feedback and reports

• Participant feedback on Racecheck ↗

  The three visible accounts praise varied, challenging obstacles, substantial mud, marshals and the event village. Two describe the longer route as demanding but enjoyable.

  All three visible reviews were read, published in 2017–2019 and mixing 7 km and 12 km options. Historical feedback does not confirm present-day distances or facilities.

• Nuclear Rush — 2015 6 km participant assessment ↗

  Scream at my face (site author unnamed) · 2015

  The writer praises the muddy obstacle variety and value, but struggles to arrange transport and loses a camera during a prize task. The original graphic gives 90/100 overall.

  Original graphic: 90 overall, Nuclear Rush, 17 May 2015 at 10:00, nominal 6 km. The first-person writer leads three OCR newcomers and reports two-and-a-half hours on course. The graphic praises obstacles/value and criticizes transport. Named Nuclear Rush programme identity is matched; the post does not independently establish a historical street address or perfect obstacle completion. The separately sourced Racecheck aggregate remains intact. The author’s original 21 May 2016 post explicitly establishes a 100-point scale and says earlier events were updated. The revised graphic’s published number is retained directly out of 100, without multiplying an old prose mark or averaging topic bars. The full original post and graphic were read; this is one historical author assessment, not an athlete aggregate or current-course guarantee. Full individual name, entry funding and unreported completion details remain unknown; other gallery images and videos are not claimed viewed.