Rough Runner — Clapham Common (historical)

Athlete feedback and reports

• Rough Runner Clapham — 2016 extra race and group outing ↗

  Scream at my face (site author unnamed) · 2016

  The writer enjoys a free extra 5 km before joining friends for the booked 10 km, praises the obstacles and marshals, and questions the price. The graphic gives 88/100 overall.

  Original graphic: 88 overall, 18 September 2016 at 10:30, nominal 10 km at Clapham Common. The writer reports a paid £63.65 booked event and an organizer-offered extra 5 km race for free, followed by the slower group 10 km. They praise obstacles, marshals and the Travelator, while questioning price. Direct organizer feedback and the free additional race are explicit. Own finish times and all obstacle outcomes are unstated. The author’s original 21 May 2016 post explicitly establishes a 100-point scale and says earlier events were updated. The revised graphic’s published number is retained directly out of 100, without multiplying an old prose mark or averaging topic bars. The full original post and graphic were read; this is one historical author assessment, not an athlete aggregate or current-course guarantee. Full individual name, entry funding and unreported completion details remain unknown; other gallery images and videos are not claimed viewed.

• Rough Runner Clapham — a complimentary first obstacle race ↗

  TaleOfTwoRuns (publishing account) · 2016

  The writer enjoys a first obstacle race with a friend, describing 10 km, 15 obstacles, failed water obstacles and repeated Travelator attempts before finishing. Registration is quick and the medal doubles as a bottle opener.

  Complete original first-person recap read, published 19 September 2016. Clapham Common and 2016 are explicit; the exact raced day is unstated here. The author discloses complimentary entry. An uncertain “about 1:20 mins” is not standardized into a verified finish time. Failed obstacles, water falls and retries remain explicit. One publishing-account review, not multiple independent athletes because friends appear; individual full byline not established. No numerical satisfaction overall. Photos/video not claimed viewed.