Wolf Run — Winter Wolf, Stanford Hall (historical)

Athlete feedback and reports

• Original 2016 participant assessment ↗

  Jonathan Chen / Scream at my face · 2016

  Chen’s original graphic gives 76/100. He enjoys forest, river and trench obstacles and helpful marshals, while criticizing cold-water effects, slippery logs and the arrangement of showers, changing and parking.

  Complete original post and score graphic read: 5 November 2016 at 13:20, nominal 10 km. The graphic date governs over its misleading 161112 filename. His finish time and full obstacle record are unstated; the employer team’s earlier wave and time are not his. Stanford Hall identity is independently verified. The author’s original May 2016 methodology explicitly establishes 100 points and revises earlier graphics. This is one historical individual assessment; no topic average or conversion to stars. Entry funding is unknown. Other photos and videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.

• A fundraising team’s 2016 Winter Wolf outing ↗

  Brad Goldsmith, quoted by employer Premier · 2016

  Goldsmith describes a team finish just over two hours, supportive teamwork, good organization and atmosphere, with cold-water partitions particularly demanding. He wanted to return.

  Complete original employer report read. It identifies Stanford Hall, 5–6 November 2016, approximately 10 km and a Saturday 10:30 wave. This is one selected quotation/report, not twelve independent reviews. Goldsmith is Premier’s marketing executive and team captain; employer fundraising and promotional selection are explicit, entry funding unknown. No numerical satisfaction score, full obstacle record or Chen finish time is inferred. Other images are not claimed viewed.

• Winter Wolf 2016 — Stephen Jones’s report ↗

  Stephen Jones / Cool As Leicester · 2016

  Jones enjoys the demanding muddy winter course, volunteers, organization and finisher shirt. He describes a finish, cold-water challenges and failed monkey bars, and would return.

  Complete signed original report read, published 22 November 2016. Winter Wolf 2016, Stanford Hall and approximately 10 km are explicit; he reports Saturday’s 10:00 first wave, without an exact raced date or time result. Failed monkey bars remain explicit. The publisher asked him to review the event; entry funding is unstated. Participant counts and temperatures are attributed observations, not verified measurements. No satisfaction number is inferred. Embedded video and other photos are not claimed viewed.

• Historical platform feedback: Winter Wolf ↗

  Aaron G and Chris / Let’s Do This

  Two native five-star cards praise organization, a challenging course and encouragement, and advise dry warm clothes afterward. One writer discusses both Autumn and Winter.

  Native historical Winter Wolf aggregate, 5/5 from two complete cards labeled 2019 and 2017. Aaron G discusses Autumn and Winter together; Chris gives brief winter clothing advice. Exact raced days, individual distances and complete obstacle results are unstated. The listing’s 2021 date is not the cards’ edition or a current-course guarantee. One page, not a verified independent-finisher census. Chen’s separate 2016 76/100 is retained without averaging.

Event details

Dates

Last listed edition: 5–6 Nov 2016

Formats

Historical 10 km winter OCR

Place

Stanford Hall, Lutterworth, Leicestershire, United Kingdom

Series

Wolf Run

• The employer’s original November 2016 report identifies the winter 10 km at Stanford Hall on 5–6 November; the participant graphic identifies Saturday 5 November. The booking platform retains a separate 6–7 November 2021 listing. That listing is not proof of a 2021 race being held or a current programme.
• Historical winter programme, separate from Summer Wolf at Stanford Hall and Autumn Wolf at Offchurch. The primary platform rating concerns 2017/2019 feedback; Jonathan Chen’s separate 2016 76/100 is retained in his written account. Different editions and scales are not averaged.