Browse 8,166 race listings and athlete ratings. Explore triathlons, half marathons, marathons, ultras and obstacle races, including races we haven’t rated yet.
New listings are checked against organizer and registration pages. Race reports and feedback are linked even while a race is awaiting a full rating. Each account reflects its author, edition and race format. Past editions stay labeled until a new date is listed.
Enjoys the fun, mutual help and organization. Reports waiting at obstacles in a later wave.
Marmottestraileuse’s complete card reports 2017 and 2018 outings, posted 11 October 2018. The native 5/5 is one writer’s overall across repeated outings, not two independent reviews. Exact raced days and measured lengths remain unknown.
2017 urban obstacle programme — nominal 5–10 km / 10–20 obstacles · Member reports 10 km / thirty obstacles and an uncertain November outing Retired series; historical listing.
Enjoys the mud, water and varied obstacles. Criticizes unclear marking and the absence of changing facilities.
The complete native card by Stephdegiencourt labels 2017, ten kilometres and thirty obstacles, posted 30 August 2019. Its directly published 3/5 from one remains historical. The writer mentions cold in November, whereas the separately read programme is dated September; the exact personal day and obstacle count are unresolved.
Praises the seaside scenery and accessible obstacles. Criticism includes high prices, limited refreshments, finish rewards and a quiet event village.
All three complete native cards and metadata read: one labels 2016, another has no raced year, and David 14 recalls 2015–2017. The original native overall is 2.7/5 from three, retaining the 2/5 and 2.5/5 cards. Repeated outings do not multiply the author count.
Jean-Philippe Guilloux / Team HCT, obstacle.fr · 2017
16 September 2017 competitive obstacle wave — reported 13 km / 22 obstacles
Enjoys the seaside setting and organization. Criticizes marking, music, extensive pavement, the unused memory task and the fit of some obstacles.
Complete original first-person report published 20 September 2017, explicitly dating the outing to 16 September. It describes 13 km / 22 obstacles and wave 0 at 09:00. Team HCT/coaching ties and the partner-supported publisher are disclosed; personal funding is unstated. Others’ rankings, timing and perceived hazards are not independently audited, and no clean competitive finish or numerical overall is inferred.
Historical Classic Fun OCR — 5+ km / one lap · Historical Classic Advanced OCR — 10+ km / two laps · Historical Classic Extreme OCR — 20+ km / four laps
Likes the affordable entry and accessible obstacles. Criticizes the thin atmosphere and quiet village after the race.
Both exposed cards and metadata read, but only Uchang 13’s explicit 2017 obstacle card supplies the individual 3/5. The other card claims an undated twenty-one-kilometre outing, inconsistent with the verified five/ten-kilometre programme and without a resolved event match. That card and the page-wide 4/5 from two are excluded. The selected card’s next outing with a child is only a plan.
Caroline enjoys the varied obstacles and refreshments and wants to return, but criticizes a long collection queue, delayed starts and substantial waiting at some obstacles. Her first-person account contrasts those delays with the fun she has on the course.
Complete original report read; it explicitly identifies 9 September 2017, Losheimer Stausee and nominal 10 km. Caroline’s personal waiting estimates and finish are historical recollections, not audited timing or an unchanged current-service finding. One signed club account; her companion’s performance is not another review. Entry funding and other commercial relationships are unstated.
One contributor briefly praises the organization and the course; the other native card provides scores without narrative reasons.
Complete two-card original section read. Attributed platform opinion with actual attendance, finish, class and identity unverified; posted 8 September 2018, not a verified raced date. The containing page’s Saarland/Losheim fields are retained despite its confusing Black Forest title. One containing source, not two independently verified athletes or feedback for Horb.
2015 Stadium Shah Alam night obstacle outing — nominal 7 km; teamwork and failed rope climb
Finds the first stadium night challenge tough but enjoyable, especially a wall that needs teamwork. Fails the late rope climb and describes fatigue; the planned phone-free outing limits course photographs.
Complete original post and its 27 May 2015 participant update read. The opening plans the 23 May Shah Alam outing and a 02:00 start; the update confirms the personal experience, not an independently checked wave, finish or result. It describes a nominal 7 km and fifteen obstacles, separate from the catalog’s 2016/2017 programmes and Batu Kawan. Team assistance and the failed rope climb remain explicit. Personal funding and affiliation are unstated. No score is supplied or inferred; photographs, video and training prescriptions are excluded.
Historical Classic Fun OCR — 5+ km / one lap · Historical Classic Advanced OCR — 10+ km / two laps · Historical Classic Extreme OCR — 20+ km / four laps
Lukas briefly praises the course, obstacles and location. The other four cards provide numerical opinions without written explanations.
All five original cards, posted 2017–2019, read. The short preference supplies no exact raced date, entered class or independent attendance/finish evidence. The N/A topic in one card is not zero and is not used to recalculate the native aggregate. Affiliation and entry funding unknown. Complete relevant original authored text/cards read. Exact identities, attendance, finish, obstacle completion and measured conditions are not independently audited. No numerical score is inferred from sentiment; no photographs, video, audio or complete comment archive was reviewed or reused.
The reviewer praises the challenging obstacles and how well they were put together.
Complete original card labelled 2020, posted 1 June 2024. The spotlight duplicates it. The exact raced day, property, class, distance, identity, affiliation, funding and finish are unverified. This is historical programme-level opinion, not confirmation of an unchanged Clay Springs route.
ergeko (public Steemit handle; full name unstated) · 2017
Obstacle
The first-time obstacle runner reports a 10 km Urban Challenge with twenty obstacles, including a high halfpipe, hanging traverse and sandbag carries. The experience leaves them eager to try another event.
Complete original Steemit post and its six displayed comments read; published metadata is 6 September 2017. The author says ten days earlier, which is not used to assign an exact raced day. They describe their own 10 km Hamburg outing; other general distance/price examples and borrowed source images are not separate race experiences. Own time, every-obstacle completion and independently verified finish are unstated. Steemit displays author rewards; race-entry funding and brand relationships are unstated. The Ecency discovery page is a redisplay of this same post, not a second account. Photos and audio were not viewed or played, and no numerical satisfaction rating is inferred.
Enjoys the mutual help, varied obstacles, atmosphere and pre-race festivities. Wants the Courchevel lake used more extensively during the race.
One complete card covers reported 2015, 2016 and 2017 outings and gives the native 5/5. It is one author’s review, not three independent ratings. The original municipality confirms the 20 August 2017 Le Praz event and a new course; the separate first-person report describes the two-stage start. The score does not establish an unchanged route across those years.
20 August 2017 mountain OCR — two-stage start and cable-car transfer; exact length unstated
Enjoys the scenery, atmosphere, refreshments and playful obstacles. Describes the unusual two-stage start and his own unsuccessful attempts at a difficult ramp.
Complete original first-person narrative published 21 August 2017, explicitly covering the previous day’s new Courchevel course. The writer tests branded clothing and a waterproof bag; the publication has partner interests and entry funding is unstated. Perceived temperatures, reported participation and safety praise are not independently measured or certified. No numerical overall, protective-equipment recommendation or clinical conclusion is imported.
Historical Classic Fun OCR — 5+ km / one lap · Historical Classic Advanced OCR — 10+ km / two laps · Historical Classic Extreme OCR — 20+ km / four laps
2016 Egg — nominal 10K / two laps; participant reports a longer outing
Enjoys the trails, scenery, parking, showers, food and organization. Finds the obstacle mix weaker than expected for a qualifying race, with no monkey bars, loaded carries or wooden walls, and reports taking one wrong direction.
The full original 2016 narrative and conclusion were read. The contributor publishes as muddy on Muddyface; the other seven reports in this batch are the same contributor, not independent athletes. Personal entry funding and official results are unverified. The festival is at the Egg fire station, with start and finish above it; a precise street entrance remains unstated. He entered a nominal ten-kilometre/two-lap outing but reports longer GPS/announcer estimates. Those figures and his climb estimate are not certified measurements. Exact raced day is unstated; 22 August is publication. The existing platform aggregate is unchanged.
Hole enjoys the welcoming atmosphere, nearby parking, varied obstacles and festival. He criticizes the timing/results process and insufficient toilets and would prefer more demanding terrain.
A 2016 participant account at Spruce Meadows, published by Obstacle Racing Media. The exact raced day and entry funding are unknown. It describes the earlier course and gives no numerical score.
Enjoys the extensive mud, forest course and obstacle variety. Reports little queuing except at a tunnel and finds several new obstacles demanding.
Complete original narrative and evaluation read, published 26 July about 22 July 2017. Explicit General 16 km at Vojenský újezd Březina; the 10 km Major is not her stated raced class. Publisher contributor; entry/travel funding unknown. Personal slips, injury anecdotes, insect-eating and fitness assertions are not adopted as general safety or medical findings. The weather “na jedničku” idiom is not an event rating.
Michal Škobrtal / quoted by Lenka Haberová, Military Police · 2016
Historical 2016 Army Run — reported nearly 11 km / 40+ obstacles
Describes mixed feelings after a physically and mentally demanding race, while thanking the organizers for their preparation of the obstacles.
Complete original Military Police article and direct participant quotations read, published 18 July 2016 about the preceding Saturday at the Vyškov military training area. The article reports almost eleven kilometres and more than forty obstacles; the exact start and named division are unstated. The participant is a military police officer quoted by his own institution, which congratulates its representatives. This is an affiliated institutional account, not an independent athlete aggregate. Funding unstated. His placing and accompanying relatives add no review units or numerical rating. The existing family’s 2017 date and General format remain separate.
Hizami enjoyed his first obstacle event and was excited to reach the finish and earn a medal. He found the hills demanding, skipped several grip or group obstacles, and both enjoyed the experience and had expected more from it.
Complete original Malay post read; this paraphrase retains translation uncertainty. It describes the Saturday before its August 2016 post and nominal 10 km/fifteen obstacles, matched to the separately verified 20 August Ranch programme. Resorts World Genting provided his hotel stay; race-entry funding is unstated. The Awana lodging is not the race venue. He entered with Neyra, sometimes hesitated to join larger groups, and explicitly skipped obstacles. One report, not two athletes. Comments, Instagram media and photos are unread. No numerical score is supplied, and his upcoming Sepang recommendation is not a review of that future event.
Jonathan Nyst and Norazlan Rabani, published by Miera Nadhirah · 2017
Obstacle
First-timer Jonathan Nyst found Wheel of Fortune particularly demanding even as a fitness trainer and valued the challenge. Returning participant Norazlan Rabani enjoyed the cooler setting and teamwork, and was pleased with his group’s improving completion time.
The complete relevant original 23 July 2017 article and its two attributed exchanges were read through the empty comment section before later reader failures. It explicitly identifies The Ranch, 15 July, 10 km and sixteen obstacles. It is a selected release-style interview source, not the blogger’s verified personal race; funding and selection independence are unknown. One containing account, not one per speaker or teammate. A broken/duplicated paragraph is not reconstructed beyond its clear statements, and reported elapsed time is not a rating. Photos and footage are unread. No numerical score, independent finish verification or later course assessment is inferred.
Flachau-specific comments praise the mountain setting and atmosphere, while some criticize fees, organization and the closed waterslide. A 2017 writer identifies a fourth visit. Several other cards provide only scores.
All nine native cards were read. This containing summary excludes the explicit old Obertauern account and does not assign the mixed 4.3/9 aggregate or a recomputed eight-card mean. Remaining comments posted in 2017/2018 have generally unknown raced days and distances; repeated aliases do not establish independent athletes.
The writer chooses the nominal 10 km and finishes in under two hours, reporting 9.44 km on their GPS. They enjoy the region, downhill slide and cold water but encounter mass-start queues, find the obstacles too easy, and miss the closed major waterslide.
Complete original first-person report posted 16 November 2017; exact raced day is unstated. The 20 km explanation is not proof of a two-lap finish. GPS distance and differing approximate ascent figures are not certified course measurements. No free-entry disclosure is found on this source; the complimentary entry disclosed in the author’s separate Celtic report is not assumed here. No overall score.
Sobinger describes sustained uphill running, mountain views, climbing obstacles and useful refreshment stops, followed by a descent and closely spaced walls, nets, mud and cold water near the finish. She says the team had great fun and wanted to enter again.
Original report published 14 July 2017, signed by Petra Sobinger and describing two members of the publisher’s team taking part. It reports 9.4 km, about 380 m ascent and fourteen obstacles; the host tourism board advertised 9.2 km per lap. The report describes its own course experience but gives no numerical satisfaction score or exact race day, and does not establish every obstacle was cleared. Publisher participation and the site’s advertising context are disclosed; entry/travel funding is unstated. One containing account, not two independent reviews. The linked photo gallery is unread and no photographs are reused.
Historical paired obstacle/canoe hybrid — member reports 6 km and a 2 km canoe leg; total interpretation uncertain · 2017 report describes nominal 6/7 km course with 2 km canoe; total interpretation uncertain
Historical paired obstacle/canoe hybrid — member reports 6 km and a 2 km canoe leg; total interpretation uncertain
Enjoys an original, friendly two-person challenge combining obstacles and canoeing. The native writer praises the atmosphere and format.
Ricou26’s complete card, posted 9 February 2019, has no explicit raced year. Mentioning a third season does not establish 2018 as the personal year. It describes a six-kilometre paired course and a two-kilometre canoe descent, without resolving whether that leg is included in the nominal total. The directly published native 5/5 from one applies to that undated hybrid experience, not a plain running course.
Frédéric Dehner / obstacle.fr, posted by Sèb Desbenoit · 2017
2 July 2017 paired obstacle/canoe hybrid — reported nominal 6/7 km with a 2 km canoe leg; exact total unverified
Enjoys the originality, price and convivial atmosphere of the obstacle and canoe combination. Wants better signage for baggage storage and describes shallow water affecting the canoe leg.
Complete original first-person account published 10 August 2017, explicitly covering 2 July. Frédéric and Théo form one pair and one containing publication, not two independent reviews. He reports narrowly missing the final; that placing and the course dimensions are personal recollections. The partner-supported publisher’s interests are disclosed; individual entry funding is unstated. Youth, final-round performance and unverified medical or safety claims do not become new finisher evidence. No numerical overall is supplied.
Members enjoy the lake setting, costumes, teamwork and a relaxed atmosphere. One criticizes price. Participants describe the option to bypass obstacles they do not want to attempt.
Three cards describe twelve-kilometre outings in 2016 and 2017 and an undated five-kilometre outing; all were posted in 2019. The sponsor’s original May 2017 programme advertises 3–4 June at Bombannes. The timed nine-kilometre, untimed twelve-kilometre and five-kilometre options remain separate; a bypass does not establish an all-obstacle finish. Personal funding, attendance and finishes are unverified; each containing page counts once.