Browse 8,166 race listings and athlete ratings. Explore triathlons, half marathons, marathons, ultras and obstacle races, including races we haven’t rated yet.
New listings are checked against organizer and registration pages. Race reports and feedback are linked even while a race is awaiting a full rating. Each account reflects its author, edition and race format. Past editions stay labeled until a new date is listed.
8,166 races in the catalog
Showing 6,481–6,504
Rheinstetten (marketed as Karlsruhe), Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Jean Mathieu, guest runner with Team SPECKtakulär · 2016
Obstacle
Mathieu enjoys the inventive obstacles, teammates and other runners, but criticizes a long cold pre-start wait, repeated queues and food stalls packed away by his finish. The organization and its response to criticism put him off entering more Mudiator events.
The complete original is published 26 April 2016 and names the DM-Arena and Epplesee course. It explains both 8/16 km classes without identifying his selected distance or independently proving the exact raced day. The delays and closed stalls are his historical experience, not a universal or current finding. Guest team membership is explicit; entry funding and independence are unknown. Complete relevant original authored text read. Actual identity, finish, obstacle completion and measured conditions are not independently audited. No overall numerical score is supplied or inferred. Images, video, audio and whole comment archives were not reviewed or reused.
The writer likes the Olympic Park location, obstacles and included photos, but criticizes a moved wave, heavy carry and the village closing. The original graphic gives 80/100 overall.
Original graphic: 80 overall, 9 April 2016 at 16:20, Sprint labelled 5 km at Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. The post has only a title/date and event link; its full participant assessment is in the original graphic. The writer describes obstacles, praises location and included photos, and criticizes a shifted wave, heavy carry and the village packing up. No personal measured time or complete obstacle/penalty record is supplied. The venue advertised 3–5 miles, and another participant describes 7 km. The author’s original 21 May 2016 post explicitly establishes a 100-point scale and says earlier events were updated. The revised graphic’s published number is retained directly out of 100, without multiplying an old prose mark or averaging topic bars. The full original post and graphic were read; this is one historical author assessment, not an athlete aggregate or current-course guarantee. Entry funding and unreported completion details remain unknown; other gallery images and videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.
Worthington praises easy access, registration, encouraging volunteers, varied carries and the finish atmosphere. She reports a 1:31:24 finish after a failed spear throw and 30 burpees, while finding less mud than she prefers.
Complete original named first-person report read, published 20 April for 9 April 2016 at Olympic Park. She calls the Sprint 7 km, versus the other graphic’s 5 km and venue’s 3–5 miles. Reported time and spear penalty remain explicit; neither becomes a rating. One account, not two because a companion finishes with her. Media host and unknown entry funding disclosed. Child-race observations and Allianz Park comparisons are not separate adult reviews; photos/videos not claimed viewed.
The selected interviewees enjoy the scenery, teamwork and mix of running with obstacles. They describe slippery monkey bars and a queue at the final water obstacle.
Complete original 13 March 2016 on-site article and relevant direct quotations read. These are five selected voices in one publication, not five independently published reviews. Individual results, obstacle clearance, identities and funding are not independently audited. Publisher selection and the sponsor-linked executive voice remain explicit. No numerical overall, training advice or source media is imported.
Call Urbanathlon a favorite and enjoy the city scenery and mix of running with obstacles. Attribute disappointing times to lengthy obstacle queues.
Complete relevant original 9 March 2015 participant narrative read. It describes fourteen kilometres, nine obstacles and the Sports Hub/CBD route; an independent original identity passage locates that programme at Kallang Practice Track. Exact personal day, finish and obstacle completion are unverified. Two coauthors are one publication. Clinical and incident-causation claims are excluded, funding is unstated, and no numerical overall or source media is imported.
Mountbatten Vocational School / institution-selected annual report · 2016
12 March 2016 institutional staff/student group context — individual classes unstated
The institutional report says its student-and-staff group enjoyed participating and received completion medals.
Complete relevant original scanned passage, physical page 38 / printed page 73, read in pixels. Fifteen students and five staff are one selected collective report, not twenty ratings. Individual adult distance, ages, performance and funding are unstated. This is institutional event context, with no named individual evaluation or numerical overall. Unrelated clinical/educational material and source photographs are excluded.
Historical 2015 winter OCR — approximately 3 km loops; full option about 9 km · Historical 12 March 2016 accounts — one loop or three reported 3.3 km loops; exact measured length unknown
Historical 12 March 2016 Peurunka recreational OCR — reported three 3.3 km loops
Enjoys the varied snow, climbing and crawling obstacles, encouragement from other entrants and the event organization. Finds the first loop hardest while the early field is making tracks through deep snow.
The complete original report and conclusion were read. Its author metadata identifies Timppa, published 16 March 2016 and later modified in 2025; related-story dates do not date this race. The contemporary partner-blog account corroborates Saturday 12 March at Peurunka. He reports entering the recreational category, starting near competitive runners and completing three approximately 3.3-kilometre loops. Exact official measurement and result are unverified. His club shirt and two companions are not separate reviews; entry funding is unstated. A 2015 map caption does not establish the 2016 route. Health, training and all-fitness recommendations are excluded; reported time and placing are not a numerical overall.
Lihavat Ensihoitajat / unnamed author; event-partner blog · 2016
Historical 12 March 2016 Peurunka OCR — one reported relaxed loop; exact distance/class unknown
Describes an early queue at the first obstacle, enjoyable snow slides and encouragement along a hilly course. Completes one relaxed walking loop, skips one pipe obstacle and feels pleased at the finish.
The complete original 13 March 2016 account explicitly describes the previous day at Peurunka, supporting 12 March. Its archive block and acquired permalink have the same complete body and count once. The author is displayed as Unknown; companions’ names do not identify the narrator. The blog discloses close year-long ExtremeRun cooperation and thanks supporters. Its separate 7 February post records a prize of free entry to all 2016 ExtremeRun events, but both bylines are unknown, so the narrator’s exact identity continuity, individual funding and companions’ terms are unverified. One loop is reported; exact length, entry class and official result are unstated. Medical, weight, diet, alcohol and unrelated afterparty material are excluded. No numerical overall.
Enjoys the snowy setting, varied terrain and efficient registration. Describes demanding cold hills and failures at the snowball target and hanging rings, followed by burpees.
The full original 2016 narrative and conclusion were read. The contributor publishes as muddy on Muddyface; the other seven reports in this batch are the same contributor, not independent athletes. Personal entry funding and official results are unverified. The body explicitly dates the race 23 January; the 24 January publication is separate. He chooses the 09:00 Elite wave to return home earlier. Sprint is the historical class, with exact length, result and entrance unstated. No numerical overall is supplied.
Wani strongly criticizes the last-wave experience: unclear directions, obstacle queues, loose or broken equipment, early removal of markers and closed refreshment stalls. She also reports bag-collection confusion, limited water and unsuitable remaining shirt sizes. Companionship was the main positive, and she did not want to return.
Complete signed original entry and its displayed comment section read. Published 28 January 2016, it describes the preceding weekend’s nominal 10 km Sentosa outing; the exact 23 January day comes from the separate published Viper programme. The author and team skipped obstacles because of queues or equipment concerns and made detours, so complete obstacle performance is not claimed. Estimated elapsed time is not a satisfaction score. Entry funding is unstated; photos credited to Neville Teo are unread and not reused. Companions add no independent reviews, and the future Spartan recommendation is not a review of that future event. This historical account does not assess Kallang or later Sentosa courses.
Uwe enjoys the dragon-boat prelude, challenging obstacles and team atmosphere. He wants more course marshals and chooses penalty exercises instead of the final airbag jump, which he dislikes.
The complete source identifies the rowing-regatta site, nominal 8 km Legionär, a later 8.5 km description and twenty-five claimed obstacles. The identical second lap was available but was not his entry. His bypass, failed obstacle and concerns about other people’s injuries are personal observations, not an audited accident rate or safety finding. The claimed twenty-five completed obstacles are not treated as every-obstacle clearance. Uwe / muddy publishes OCR training, mental-coaching and retail links; entry funding and independence are unverified. Complete relevant original authored text read. Actual identity, finish, obstacle completion and measured conditions are not independently audited. No overall numerical score is supplied or inferred. Images, video, audio and whole comment archives were not reviewed or reused.
Historical 2015 urban obstacle outings — nominal 5 km and 10 km · Retired Défi Run series; no future programme announced Retired series; historical listing.
Historical 2015 urban obstacle outings — nominal 5 km and 10 km
Enjoys the atmosphere, scenery and accessible obstacles. Some writers find the flat paved route and obstacles too simple.
All four exposed cards and metadata read. Jeff 06 and Domi describe ten-kilometre 2015 outings; melibrecc’s five-kilometre 2015 review appears twice with identical text and posting date. The native 3.3/5 from four is retained as the publisher’s uncorrected population, including that duplicate. It represents three distinct author narratives, not four independent athletes; no replacement mean is calculated.
Andre Kraus, interviewed in HNA’s contemporary report · 2015
Obstacle
Kraus wants to return but finds the running sections on developed paths too long.
This is the named athlete’s short attributed feedback in a complete contemporary article about the 2015 inaugural Wülmersen race, not an athlete-authored full recap or a 2017-card explanation. The report’s general claims about many people wanting to return are not additional independent accounts. Reporter and organizer comments stay separate; no current route or independently verified result is established. Complete relevant original authored text read; photographs, videos and audio were not reviewed or reused. Identity, participation, finish, measured distance, obstacle completion and funding are not independently audited. No satisfaction score is inferred.
Enjoys the race and timely start but wants a better race pack and women’s shirt cut. Finds the sand demanding and the final electrical obstacle memorable.
Complete original 25 October 2015 article read. Her class is six kilometres, not her friend’s Extreme outing. She reports a returning-runner discount; other funding is unknown. Her approval does not verify universal safety or obstacle conditions. The earlier 2013 recollection is separately scoped. No numerical overall or source media.
2015 six-kilometre Sentosa course — assistance and skipped ramp
Enjoys the obstacle variety and beach-and-jungle setting, while finding a net tunnel weak and disliking the final electrical obstacle. Walks or jogs between obstacles and receives help on walls.
Complete original 18 October 2015 written narrative and relevant authored captions read. The author skips the curved ramp and uses assistance, so no clean all-obstacle finish is inferred. Her husband is not an additional source. Conditions and obstacle dimensions remain self-reported; funding and affiliation are unstated. No health prescriptions, numerical overall or source photograph is imported.
Historical individual obstacle-course championship — approximately 8.5–9 miles in 2014 · Historical team relay · 2015 nominal ten-mile standard course and short OCR Warrior
Historical approximately nine-mile individual course
Praises the steep course, challenging obstacles, helpful volunteers and community. Wants more toilets, vendors and on-site lodging, better aid spacing in one stretch and a technical finisher shirt.
Published 25 October 2014, matched to King’s Domain / Mud, Guts & Glory in Oregonia. Author is the publisher’s founder, a friend of organizer Adrian Bijanada, and originally planned to help at the event; entry/travel funding unknown. He completed the individual event, while the next day’s team race was still anticipated. Three fully read same-page comments offer brief enthusiasm with identity/format/funding limits; they do not add source units or a verified review population. The personal 4.5-star assessment has no stated maximum. No numerical score is inferred from the narrative.
Describes cold, technical terrain and repeated difficult obstacles as exhausting and emotionally demanding. Values encouragement from the crowd, teammates and fellow racers and feels proud of persevering.
Complete original narrative, published 24 October 2016 and modified 25 October, explicitly closes with 17 October 2015. Original organizer partner articles corroborate 17–18 October 2015. Selected Team Australia / elite women perspective; funding unknown. Author labels the venue “King’s Compond, Mason” while organizer history explicitly returns to King’s Domain, Oregonia. The named championship, date and course establish the historical family; retain the geographic-label discrepancy, not a venue move. Band lost and some obstacles skipped; not a complete-obstacle finisher claim. No medical advice or numerical score is adopted. This is the same author as the separate 2016 Blue Mountain report.
Historical Commando obstacle course — nominal 11 km
Members praise teamwork, atmosphere, organization and varied obstacles. They criticize increasing prices and queues for later waves.
Three cards describe eleven-kilometre outings labeled 2014, 2018 or unstated, posted 2019–2021. Their exact personal starts and dates are unknown. The separate 4 October 2015 Stadium/Parc du Héron account verifies a historical route, without proving it unchanged for all three native cards. Personal funding, attendance and finishes are unverified; each containing page counts once.
Enjoys the stadium setting, wooded course, varied obstacles and time with her partner. Criticizes the compulsory advance bib trip, repeated cold-water crossings, limited on-course refreshments, shower directions and cold showers, and weak spectator atmosphere.
First-person account of 4 October 2015, posted the following day, repeatedly describing eleven kilometres despite a contradictory seventeen-kilometre subheading. It counts as one writer’s account, not independent reviews from both partners. Funding is unstated. Her impressions of smell and water quality are not laboratory findings. Claims about the last waves are secondhand; no early obstacle dismantling or sewage contamination is established. Photos and linked media are not additional evidence.
Historical adult obstacle course — exact personal distance unstated
Describes a fun, well-organized experience, while criticizing refreshments depending on the start wave and the entry price.
One complete card labels its experience 2015 and supplies the native 3.5/5, posted 26 November 2019. The original dated specialist report and contemporary municipal branded calendar independently establish 13 September 2015 at Montreuil-sur-Mer. Personal length, start wave, funding and finish are unstated.
Public Runagora members — complete exposed event-page population
Reported historical obstacle classes; Historical obstacle course — nominal 13 km / about 20 obstacles in 2015 programme
Members praise teamwork, obstacles, organization and animation. Criticism includes increasing cost, bib and obstacle queues, cold water and limited refreshments. Unpleasant-looking water is a participant impression, not a tested contamination finding.
Native event-page average on an explicitly stated five-point scale. Cards describe reported 2014, 2015, 2017, 2018 and 2019 outings and unstated years; posted 2018–2023. One explicitly names Lac de Vénérieu in 2017. The original 2015 programme verifies 5–6 September at Vénérieu; a member’s 2014 recollection and later exact days are not independently verified. A 2023 posting about 2018 is not a new edition. All 8 complete exposed cards, author handles and posting metadata were read in the original HTML and checked in the native browser. Values are published directly, never recomputed from topic grades. Equivalent ten-point text is not an additional score. Public handles, repeated writers and one containing page do not establish independent athlete samples. Attendance, entry funding and clean obstacle finishes are unverified. Source photographs, films and profiles were not read or reused. Perceived lengths and concerns remain attributed; medical, nutrition and unsafe technique prescriptions are excluded.
seba-strazak / public MaratonyPolskie commenter · 2015
22 August 2015 native event listing — attendance and class unverified
Calls the natural obstacles especially demanding and suggests experiencing the course firsthand.
The complete exposed short 2015 card was read. This is an attributed native community opinion with attendance, finish, entered class, funding and independent identity unverified, not a verified finisher report. Its national comparison is attributed to unspecified other competitors, not independent reviews or a validated ranking. The separately published annual-table average is 10/10 from one vote; no numerical value is inferred from this prose. Profile last-login timestamps are not publication dates, and no attempt is made to match this handle to a result-table identity.
Historical announced 1 August 2015 OCR — one, two or three nominal 5 km loops · Earlier 4 August 2012 programme — recreational and competitive options; nominal 5/10/15 km
The author enjoys ExCeL’s accessible aquatic 10 km, new inflatables and the jump, but finds the queues worse than in 2014. The graphic gives 81/100 overall.
Original 2015 graphic: 81 overall, 25 July at 11:00, nominal 10 km at ExCeL. The short original post and complete graphic form one participant account. The author likes aquatic obstacles and venue access but reports more queues and a 4.99% administration fee. The same author’s 2014 score of 90 is retained in that year’s written context without averaging or counting a second independent athlete. Finish time and every-obstacle completion in 2015 are unstated. The author’s original 21 May 2016 post explicitly establishes a 100-point scale and says earlier events were updated. The revised graphic’s published number is retained directly out of 100, without multiplying an old prose mark or averaging topic bars. The full original post and graphic were read; this is one historical author assessment, not an athlete aggregate or current-course guarantee. Entry funding and unreported completion details remain unknown; other gallery images and videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.
The writer enjoys two laps of varied aquatic obstacles, kayaking and a high jump, and praises registration and transport. They question event/photo prices and the timing pauses. The original graphic gives 90/100 overall on the author’s stated scale.
Complete original first-person text and linked graphic read. The graphic identifies 16 August 2014, ExCeL, 10 km and 90/100 overall. The writer reports a 90-minute finish excluding clocked-out obstacle periods, not a continuous elapsed result. One four-person team account, not four independent athlete reviews; assistance and every-obstacle completion are not established. The same author’s later 2015 score is displayed separately without averaging. Compensation unstated. Other photos/video not claimed viewed; the article’s general training advice is not imported. The original author’s May 2016 scale statement confirms revised earlier graphics use 100 points. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.
Sexty enjoys the inclusive atmosphere and varied aquatic course, but struggles with kayaking and wet monkey bars. He reports a 58-minute finish and praises competitors helping one another over the final walls.
Complete original staff-writer participant report read. The introduction identifies 25 July 2015 at ExCeL and a nominal 10 km course with 35 obstacles. The reported 58-minute finish includes missed monkey bars and only almost all obstacles completed; no flawless result or satisfaction score is inferred. Media affiliation, Shelter-supplied photos and unknown entry funding disclosed. Not the author’s 50-minute observation of another runner. Images/videos not claimed viewed, and exercise/medical generalizations are excluded.
The writer enjoys the high slide, canoe section and waterside obstacles, finishes after help at the monkey bars and falling from a floating tube, and praises visible marshals and water support.
Complete original first-person ExCeL report read, published 17 August 2015. The account distinguishes London from Stockton but does not establish its exact raced day, measured distance or time. Finish, assistance and water fall are reported; no perfect obstacle outcome is inferred. Publishing account lacks an individual full byline here and compensation is unknown. Weather and water comments are personal impressions, not current safety claims. One source unit, no numerical overall. Photos and embedded videos not claimed viewed.
Source-labelled 2014 obstacle-run account; class and distance unstated
The self-described newcomer liked the fun atmosphere and says the event challenged her experienced companion too. She reports completing it and wanting to return.
Complete original card labelled 2014, posted 28 May 2015; one opinion despite its repeated spotlight. The author reports two attendances. Exact 2014 property, class, identity, funding and an independently verified all-obstacle finish remain unknown. This historical programme context does not verify the retained 2015 route.
The author enjoys the obstacles, penalty incentive, dry course and included photos, but finds the Sprint short for its price and questions penalty monitoring. The revised graphic gives 90/100.
Original post and revised graphic identify Allianz Park on 16 May 2015, 12:30, nominal Sprint 5 km and 90/100. The short prose mentions the outing; most assessment is in the graphic. Own finish time, completed penalties and every-obstacle outcome are unstated. Its thirty-burpee description differs from another participant’s ten-burpee report, so no common rule is invented. Complete original post and linked graphic read. The author explicitly establishes a hundred-point scale and updates earlier graphics; the displayed number is retained directly, without topic averaging or conversion to stars. One historical author assessment, with entry funding unstated unless disclosed. Other photographs and embedded videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.
Hutchings enjoys the short, largely dry obstacle race and its strength tasks, but encounters queues and slow stadium stair carries. He reports a 45:56 finish after a missed spear throw and ten burpees.
Complete original named media participant report read, published 10 June 2015. Allianz Park and nominal 5 km are explicit; exact own raced day is unstated. His reported 45:56 includes a spear-failure ten-burpee penalty, which differs from the score author’s thirty-burpee description. No current rule or satisfaction number is inferred. Media affiliation and unknown entry funding disclosed; own account is one review. Photos and videos are not claimed viewed.
Justin praises organization, spectators, varied obstacles and the demanding stadium stairs, describing a finish and wanting to continue toward a Trifecta. He promotes the equipment used in training and a Spartan discount.
Complete original first-person commercial-host report read, published 26 June 2015. Allianz Park, nominal 5 km and a finish are explicit; exact raced day, time and full obstacle/penalty record are unstated. The Leeds store-manager role, equipment promotion, Spartan Street Team involvement and 20% discount are openly disclosed. Entry funding remains unknown. Not commercially independent, an athlete aggregate or a numerical rating. Child-race observations and family mentions are not extra adult reviews; images not claimed viewed.
The author enjoys unusual obstacles and a Tame time trial after practice, while finding some Insane drops too risky, several tasks unsuitable for their height and the safety mats unconvincing. They paid £19 using a voucher.
Original revised graphic gives 90/100 for the 4 May 2015 Tooting Bec 09:30, 100 m obstacle event. The writer explicitly races the Tame course, tries some Insane obstacles, skips others and fails several attempts. A Tame medal is described, without an independently verified time or complete Insane result. The graphic discloses a £19 voucher price versus £60 full price; the 100 m label is not a surveyed distance. Complete original post and linked graphic read. The author explicitly establishes a hundred-point scale and updates earlier graphics; the displayed number is retained directly, without topic averaging or conversion to stars. One historical author assessment, with entry funding unstated unless disclosed. Other photographs and embedded videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.