Browse 8,166 race listings and athlete ratings. Explore triathlons, half marathons, marathons, ultras and obstacle races, including races we haven’t rated yet.
New listings are checked against organizer and registration pages. Race reports and feedback are linked even while a race is awaiting a full rating. Each account reflects its author, edition and race format. Past editions stay labeled until a new date is listed.
Members praise costumes, teamwork, atmosphere, marking and obstacle variety, with some criticism of price. Their course lengths are recollections, not certified measurements.
Four cards cover reported 2017, 2018 and unstated outings, posted 2018–2020. One explicitly says Bordeaux 2018, while another 2017 participant says there was no Bordeaux race in 2018 or 2019; the conflict remains unresolved. Distances and obstacle counts also vary. This is the publisher’s historical Bordeaux event grouping, with exact personal starts unverified. Personal funding, attendance and finishes are unverified; each containing page counts once.
Uwe enjoys the scenery, varied obstacles and hills, praises quick registration and is keen to return. He finds one slippery straw-bale descent difficult and fails the hanging rings before completing penalty exercises.
The full source describes a nominal 16 km Hercules route from Schluchsee via Rothaus and back. Its Sunday 28 September wording conflicts with the original host/organizer’s 27 September 2015 announcement; the report’s literal day is not silently corrected into an independently verified raced date. Advertised/estimated obstacle counts differ between sources. His thanks to the organization do not establish whether entry was gifted. Same author as the Munich account, not an independent athlete per edition. Uwe / muddy publishes OCR training, mental-coaching and retail links; entry funding and independence are unverified. Complete relevant original authored text read. Actual identity, finish, obstacle completion and measured conditions are not independently audited. No overall numerical score is supplied or inferred. Images, video, audio and whole comment archives were not reviewed or reused.
Andreas likes the scenic route and some new obstacles, but criticizes confusing registration access, parking, repeated obstacles and the unavailable timing at his delayed start. He skips a queued obstacle with penalties and regards the outing as a worthwhile season finale despite the difficulties.
The complete 25 October 2015 report identifies the nominal 16+ km Hercules, Schluchsee start/finish and halfway Rothaus area. He reports starting without timing and supplies only an approximate finish duration; no official timed result is inferred. Road closures, queues and timing removal are his historical observations, not independently established organizer faults or current logistics. Medical details and route-image measurements are excluded. Entry funding and commercial relationships are unstated. Complete relevant original authored text read. Actual identity, finish, obstacle completion and measured conditions are not independently audited. No overall numerical score is supplied or inferred. Images, video, audio and whole comment archives were not reviewed or reused.
Historical 27 September 2014 Beast — reported 23.4 km
Finds the steep climbs and difficult descents exceptionally demanding but loves the experience and encouragement from companions. Describes satisfaction at finishing a course that exceeded her expectations.
The complete 27 September 2014 Sun Peaks Beast section and conclusion were read within the same monthly post as Red Deer. The writer reports 23.4 kilometres and twenty-six obstacles and says she paid her Trifecta fees; measurements and results are unverified. Her companions are not additional reviews. Personal medical history and training advice are not part of this course assessment. This is a 2014 Beast experience, rather than the later Sprint programme.
Glenn Hole / Obstacle Racing Media participant reporter · 2016
Historical 2016 Sun Peaks Beast — exact day and distance unverified
Praises the demanding climbs, heavy carries, mountain views and technical trails. Notes a log-crawl bottleneck and conflicting volunteer instructions, and finds the travel demanding.
The complete original narrative and conclusion were read. Published 30 September 2016, it identifies his Sun Peaks Beast experience; the exact raced day is unstated. Course figures are personal estimates, and his medical explanations and training or travel advice are excluded. Funding is unstated. His description of a perfect experience supplies no numerical value or stated maximum and is not converted into a score.
Stefan Wieclawek / guest participant account introduced by Glenn Hole · 2016
Historical 2016 Ultra Beast — approximately 50 km reported; two laps
Finds the mountain course challenging and especially values the encouragement from volunteers, spectators and later-wave Beast runners during his second lap. Says he would return.
The complete guest account and conclusion were read in Glenn Hole’s 30 September 2016 publication. It describes a reported roughly fifty-kilometre Ultra Beast with two laps; exact raced day, measured distance, placing and personal funding are unverified. The writer’s account of other runners yielding space is historical experience, not a current priority rule. The trailing rating-plugin shortcode supplies no rendered overall score.
Jessica Bleasdale / Canadian Mudd Queens participant account · 2014
Historical 2014 Ultra Beast — two laps; reported length uncertain
Values the mountain trails, encouragement from volunteers and other racers and the satisfaction of completing a major personal challenge. Criticizes discrepancies between promised and received finish items and describes particularly demanding carries and climbing.
The complete original account and conclusion were read. Published 2 October 2014, it describes her 2014 Sun Peaks Ultra Beast from a back-of-the-pack perspective. She reports two laps and conflicting forty-four-to-fifty-kilometre GPS figures versus an organizer-stated forty-seven kilometres; none is independently measured. Exact raced day and funding are unstated. Reported cutoff changes, finish-item issues and performance are personal historical accounts; medical history, hydration claims and training recommendations are excluded. No overall score is stated.
Appreciates the varied obstacles and encouragement from staff. Reports a difficult outing in the heat, with uneven obstacle spacing and confusing markings.
Complete original first-person report published 28 September 2016 and updated 1 June 2017. The closing event block identifies 24 September at Rock on Adventures, Orlando. Own Tier 1 nominally exceeds 21 km; the author reports 24 km and fifty obstacles. Volunteered for two days before racing; actual entry-fee or compensation terms and other commercial relationships are unknown. Real name is unverified. No numerical overall is stated.
The writer enjoys a free extra 5 km before joining friends for the booked 10 km, praises the obstacles and marshals, and questions the price. The graphic gives 88/100 overall.
Original graphic: 88 overall, 18 September 2016 at 10:30, nominal 10 km at Clapham Common. The writer reports a paid £63.65 booked event and an organizer-offered extra 5 km race for free, followed by the slower group 10 km. They praise obstacles, marshals and the Travelator, while questioning price. Direct organizer feedback and the free additional race are explicit. Own finish times and all obstacle outcomes are unstated. The author’s original 21 May 2016 post explicitly establishes a 100-point scale and says earlier events were updated. The revised graphic’s published number is retained directly out of 100, without multiplying an old prose mark or averaging topic bars. The full original post and graphic were read; this is one historical author assessment, not an athlete aggregate or current-course guarantee. Entry funding and unreported completion details remain unknown; other gallery images and videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.
The writer enjoys a first obstacle race with a friend, describing 10 km, 15 obstacles, failed water obstacles and repeated Travelator attempts before finishing. Registration is quick and the medal doubles as a bottle opener.
Complete original first-person recap read, published 19 September 2016. Clapham Common and 2016 are explicit; the exact raced day is unstated here. The author discloses complimentary entry. An uncertain “about 1:20 mins” is not standardized into a verified finish time. Failed obstacles, water falls and retries remain explicit. One publishing-account review, not multiple independent athletes because friends appear; individual full byline not established. No numerical satisfaction overall. Photos/video not claimed viewed.
Pocket Rocket Runners club account about Christian and Martin; exact writer unstated · 2017
Obstacle
The club presents an enjoyable team challenge with enthusiastic support and a happy finish. Obstacles feel progressively harder on the second lap, while short waits provide welcome pauses.
The complete 3 September 2017 club article identifies Hockenheimring and a nominal 16 km/fifty-obstacle Hercules entry. It is written mainly about two teammates, with a collective first-person closing; this is an attributed collective club account, not two independent first-person reviews or proof every obstacle was cleared. Exact writer, funding, measured length and results are unverified. It does not redefine the older advertised 4 September 2016 date. Complete relevant original authored text read. Actual identity, finish, obstacle completion and measured conditions are not independently audited. No overall numerical score is supplied or inferred. Images, video, audio and whole comment archives were not reviewed or reused.
Kristina Samoylova interviewing five named SMTL adult teachers · 2016
Obstacle
The teachers describe a demanding but enjoyable team outing, with carrying, crawling, water and climbing obstacles. They praise the camaraderie and organization; one also criticizes the closed start area and difficulty finding water before running. Teammates and an instructor helped, and only three team members were said to clear the final inclined obstacle.
November 2016 school newspaper, issue 2 of 2016/2017, pages 6–8 and 10. Student interviewer Kristina Samoylova quotes adult teachers Dmitry Matkov, Igor Minaev, Sergey Selichev, Mikhail Shutko and Boris Yudin. They describe the ordinary 20 August 2016 Roshchinsky 8 km team wave and explicitly did not enter the next day’s qualifier. Teammates and an instructor assisted, and some obstacles were bypassed; reaching the finish does not establish an all-obstacle completion. Their reported 14th of 107 and approximate times are race results. One institution-published interview, with entry funding unstated; future winter intentions are not a winter race review.
2016 summer programme — individual class and distance unstated
Enjoys the difficult race but finds heavy rain makes the obstacles slippery and harder to navigate. Likes the large brass medal.
The complete single card is labeled 2016. Exact raced day, class, length, funding and result are unstated. This is the entire one-card platform population behind the separate published 4.55/5 aggregate; the displayed card/header rounds to 4.6. It does not assess winter Tough Guy or a future edition.
2010 summer cross-country and repeated assault-course circuits
The first-time participant enjoys the camaraderie and water obstacles but describes long queues, demanding hills and a slow outing. Appreciates other participants helping each other.
The complete original summer narrative and conclusion were read. Its 29 July 2010 publication date is not the raced day. The author is a participating journalist; personal entry funding is unstated. Her repeated assault-course circuits are not two full cross-country laps. Her own experience is not a verified result or representative aggregate, and medical/training recommendations are excluded.
Ed Gamester / athlete and Ghost Squad volunteer · 2013
2013 summer race — approximately 17K reported; shorter variant mentioned
Enjoys the hill slaloms, water trenches and shared team finish, and praises the organizers’ hospitality.
The full original report dated 29 July 2013 describes a personal seventeen-kilometre outing and a friend’s shorter option. These are historical estimates, not certified lengths or results. The author arranged music/beer and describes organizer hospitality and a front start; those relationships qualify his praise. His separate marshal notices are not additional independent finisher reviews. Exact raced day and personal entry payment are unstated.
2016 summer Nettle Warrior — one reported 15K lap; second lap declined
Her first summer obstacle race leaves her eager to try more, although she stops after one lap rather than continuing as she had hoped.
The original publication metadata dates this article 8 November 2016; its 2021 modification is not the raced year. Her retrospectively named summer Nettle Warrior outing is separate from the later Nuts course training/kit-testing day. Her fifteen-kilometre lap wording is an estimate, not a verified thirty-kilometre completion. Exact raced day, class and entry funding are unstated. The later training assessment is not a raced Nuts review.
Rob enjoys the company and the running between obstacles, while finding repeated hill carries and the course extremely demanding. He has fun with his group but is initially unsure about returning.
The full original posted 24 July 2016 explicitly names Spittal Farm and a roughly 20 km Beast, matching the primary venue and class rather than the next year’s unknown Ultra site. He obtained another entrant’s available place; the transfer cost and funding are unstated. Distances, obstacle counts, electrical/weight descriptions, failure alternatives and group results are personal reports, not audited safety facts or measurements. Companions do not add separate reviews. Complete relevant original authored text read. Actual identity, finish, obstacle completion and measured conditions are not independently audited. No overall numerical score is supplied or inferred. Images, video, audio and whole comment archives were not reviewed or reused.
17 July 2016 F60 Water Edition — reported 20K / two laps
Enjoys the mine and lake setting, the mix of playful and demanding obstacles and the prepared, friendly volunteers. Finds the sand and repeated sack hopping strenuous, and reports striking an unseen stone in a pond.
The full original 2016 narrative and conclusion were read. The contributor publishes as muddy on Muddyface; the other seven reports in this batch are the same contributor, not independent athletes. Personal entry funding and official results are unverified. The venue archive independently confirms 17 July 2016 at F60 Lichterfeld. He describes two approximately ten-kilometre laps, not a measured course. His thanks to organizers and friendships within the OCR community qualify the personal account. The Ring of Fire and counted obstacles are personal season goals, not overall quality scores.
Barbieri finishes the two-lap 10 km Sprint in 1:18:11 with two StrongWIR companions. Her first obstacle race is tiring and scratches her legs, but she enjoys the costumes, laughter and mutual help through mud, water, hay, tyres and foam.
Complete original one-page participant report, physical/printed page 25 of Running Magazine issue 6/2016, visually read with all columns and captions. It explicitly describes 11 June and eighteen obstacle passages. Her reported finish is separate from the race winner’s time. The magazine promotes OCR and names event sponsors/ANSA imagery; no free-entry or payment disclosure is found. The nearby women’s-rugby quotation and other athletes are not additional independent source units. No numerical overall score.
5 June 2016 main obstacle race — nominal 8 km / 30+ obstacles · 3 June 2018 main race — municipal estimate about 14 km / nearly 40 obstacles; participant report says 13 km / 30+ · Separate 2018 Rebelia and Hill programmes — not main-race ratings
Adam Derkacz / Drużyna Pod Prąd, quoted by TS · 2018
2018 Wisła main Open course — participant estimate 13K / 30+; exact raced day unstated
Describes the thirteen-kilometre, thirty-plus-obstacle course as substantially harder than his earlier six-kilometre Extreme Power Run outing.
The complete relevant original article and selected first-person quotation were read. The 11 June 2018 publication reports the Wisła weekend and Open class; the municipal July 2018 paper independently places the changed main route between Malinka and lower Nowa Osada on 3 June. His exact individual raced day remains unstated. His thirteen-kilometre/thirty-plus estimate differs from the municipal about-fourteen-kilometre/nearly-forty description. Club affiliation and publisher selection are explicit; companions’ names and results are not additional reviews. The reporter’s rain description is not attributed as Adam’s own complaint. Entry funding and results are unverified; the later 2023 modification is not the raced year. No own numerical overall is supplied, and the 2016 native score does not rate this changed course.
Praises the organization, parking and demanding trails. Approves the change to the river section after heavy rain, while noting that the constructed obstacles are simpler than those at larger obstacle races.
The full original 2016 narrative and conclusion were read. The contributor publishes as muddy on Muddyface; the other seven reports in this batch are the same contributor, not independent athletes. Personal entry funding and official results are unverified. The original account identifies a nominal ten-kilometre course at the Walldorf/Werra motocross track. The date is corroborated separately by the organizer announcement and club report. Reported climb, watch distance and age-group placing are personal observations, not certified results or scores.
Original club participant narrative; posted by Gerhard / TG Kitzingen · 2016
5 June 2016 Walldorf/Werra — nominal 10K
Describes a slippery, muddy course, repeated steep climbs and the motocross section. Finishes in good spirits and notes one drink station and drinks at the finish.
The full original club report explicitly dates the race 5 June 2016. Gerhard is the posting account; the narrative’s individual author is not separately named and is not assumed to be Gerhard. It describes her own outing, with Frank’s result as a companion observation rather than a second review. Exact start entrance, funding, measured length and official result are unverified; no overall number is supplied.
Source-labelled 2016 mud OCR; personal wave unstated
Bill likes the setting and compares the experience favourably with Warrior Dash.
Complete original 2016-labelled card, posted 5 June 2016; the same-edition programme supplies the address. The spotlight repeats it. Attendance is self-reported; personal class, identity, funding and finish are unverified. No current unchanged course is claimed.
Chen’s original graphic gives 75/100. He enjoys the inflatables, warm-up energy and access, but wants more physical challenge and colour powder, a shorter warm-up, better finisher items and changing facilities.
Complete original short post and score graphic read: 28 May 2016 at 10:00, nominal 5 km. The same author’s original 2016 roundup explicitly identifies Kempton Park. Finish time and every-obstacle completion are unstated. The separate platform listing has no reviews. The author’s original May 2016 methodology explicitly establishes 100 points and revises earlier graphics. This is one historical individual assessment; no topic average or conversion to stars. Entry funding is unknown. Other photos and videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.
The author enjoys a varied set of obstacles, enthusiastic volunteers and value at £30, while preferring closer obstacle spacing and criticizing queues, bag-drop organization and expensive race photos. The original graphic gives 85/100.
Original post and graphic identify the 21 May 2016 09:30 London outing, a nominal 10 km assessment and 5 km loop. The post itself explicitly establishes the hundred-point scale. Own finish time, lap count and every-obstacle outcome are unstated. Its positive assessment and price comment are personal historical opinions, not confirmation of later event safety or current service. Complete original post and linked graphic read. The author explicitly establishes a hundred-point scale and updates earlier graphics; the displayed number is retained directly, without topic averaging or conversion to stars. One historical author assessment, with entry funding unstated unless disclosed. Other photographs and embedded videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.
Klaus, interviewed by Ich will laufen after bank reporter selection · 2016
Obstacle
Klaus enjoys varied, challenging but manageable obstacles and the encouragement from runners and spectators. He recommends the event and appreciates the cool conditions and omission of river crossings and mud pits.
The complete individual interview explicitly names 23 April 2016. Klaus reports a five-lap/10 km classified result plus an extra lap; placing and precise time are not independently verified, and the extra lap is not silently turned into a measured course length. He was selected as a rasender Reporter through Erste Bank Sparkasse Running and Wiener Neustädter Sparkasse; this is a selected promotional interview with entry funding unknown. The reported omission of mud pits and rivers is historical personal observation, not proof that the route matched the earlier advertised guide in every respect. Complete relevant original authored text read. Photographs, videos and audio were not reviewed or reused. Identity, actual participation, finish, obstacle completion and measured distances are not independently audited. No overall numerical satisfaction score is inferred.