Browse 4,049 race listings and athlete ratings. Explore triathlons, half marathons, marathons, ultras and obstacle races, including races we haven’t rated yet.
New listings are checked against organizer and registration pages. Race reports and feedback are linked even while a race is awaiting a full rating. Each account reflects its author, edition and race format. Past editions stay labeled until a new date is listed.
Chung liked the single eight-mile lap, hills and views. He describes an obstacle closure and a replacement challenge, while poor weather cut short his time in the village.
Original explicit “My Thoughts – B-” for Drumlanrig Castle in 2019, published/reposted 22 April 2023. The author describes an eight-mile single lap but does not establish his chosen total, exact raced day, time or complete obstacle outcome. The original 2019 registration and contemporary programme confirm this venue; its ten-mile headings versus 8–10 mile body are not a measurement of his outing. The author’s current site discloses Tough Mudder, 361° and Enertor ambassador roles, discount promotion and commercial links; entry compensation is unknown. No numerical thresholds are supplied and B− is not converted to stars. Complete written review and six exposed image assets visually read; two assets show the same obstacle photograph, so they are not six independent images or finisher accounts. No video is claimed watched. The historical grade does not rate Hopetoun or establish the 2024 course layout.
Chung enjoys the two-loop hill route and compact mud section, but finds the quiet village short on atmosphere. He describes running both days, needing help at Everest on Saturday and failing Funky Monkey and Kong before completing them on Sunday.
Complete original written 2018 account read, posted/reposted in April 2023. The narrative describes a Dumfries weekend; the original employer’s 2018 entry body independently names Drumlanrig for that year. Its mismatched current page heading is excluded, and its 16 June team booking is not assigned as this author’s raced day. This is older venue context, not a Hopetoun review. Exact raced dates, chosen totals and finish times are unstated. Obstacle failures and teammate assistance remain explicit. The author’s current site discloses Tough Mudder, 361° and Enertor ambassador roles, discount promotion and commercial links; entry compensation is unknown. No native numerical or letter overall is exposed. Gallery/video not claimed watched; estimated elevation is not a surveyed fact.
The fundraiser credits teammates with getting her through submerged pipes and other difficult obstacles on 15 June 2019. She describes severe cold late in the course and repeated falls at the electric-wire obstacle, then celebrates starting and finishing together.
Complete original first-person fundraiser account read on the institutional publisher’s site. The containing account is Edinburgh CRF Genetics Core; the individual name comes from its own Louise-MacGillivray fundraising URL, rather than a displayed individual byline. It explicitly gives Drumlanrig Castle, Saturday 15 June 2019 and an 08:00 start. Total distance, finish time and perfect obstacle completion are unstated; teamwork, assistance and falls remain explicit. Fundraising motivation and unknown entry compensation disclosed. One participant narrative, not an institutional or team-wide athlete rating. No numerical score or medical claims are imported.
Jonny Mcdonald, quoted by Blackzone Coaching · 2017
Obstacle
Mcdonald describes breaking away early, clearing the final two obstacles without penalties and winning the competitive race. He then completes his planned three laps for roughly 50 km of training over about nine hours, and thanks his coach for the progress.
Complete original coach-published first-person athlete report read. The host explicitly identifies Drumlanrig Castle and the 2017 edition, and reports 1:32:12 for the race; the athlete’s own approximate description is around 1:32 and a 16–17 km lap. His later three-lap / roughly 50 km training day is separate from that competitive race time. The exact raced day and flawless completion of all three laps are not established. Coach-selected athlete success story and the stated £500 prize disclosed; other entry funding is unknown. The explicitly identified raced edition is 2017, rather than its later publication date. No numerical satisfaction score is inferred from time or placing.
Chung likes Drumlanrig’s hills, woods and revised route, favoring the 15 km option over a 10 km course with long stretches between obstacles. He criticizes route length differences for Infinity distance recognition and a quieter finish-area atmosphere.
Complete original written account read; published 8 January 2023 about 2022. The text identifies its 10 km video as Sunday 3 July at 10:00 and calls that route 11.5 km, with 15/5 km options described as 16.5/6 km. Those are author-reported distances, not surveyed measurements or proof he completed all formats. Exact finish times and full obstacle outcomes remain unstated. The author’s current site discloses Tough Mudder, 361° and Enertor ambassador roles, discount promotion and commercial links; entry compensation is unknown. No native numerical or letter overall is exposed. Embedded video/timestamps and gallery, including finish captions, are not treated as watched evidence. Same author as the older accounts; does not rate Hopetoun or the 2024 Infinity rules.
HDsports contributors (named/aliased and anonymous)
Obstacle
The brief substantive participant comment enthusiastically recommends the race and describes it as the hardest obstacle event they had done. Another card offers a one-word positive opinion; the remaining cards provide scores without reasons.
All six complete original cards read. This is brief 2017/2018 historical platform feedback with mostly score-only cards, unknown individual distances and unverified participant identities; it is not a detailed course audit or a review of Oberhof. Native aggregate kept separately from the short text.
The brief comments praise an enjoyable event and fellow participants. One writer identifies a third visit in 2019, while 2020/2021 comments look forward to a future outing. Several other entries provide only numerical scores.
Historical Remsfeld aggregate from ten cards posted 2017–2022. Pre-event hopes are not confirmed finishes, and repeated Guest aliases are not ten independent athletes. Most exact raced days and 9/18 km choices are unstated. A 2021 post explicitly refers back to 2019; posting dates and common October 2025 edits are not race editions. The event ended after the 2023 season.
Klös and Stephie finish their two-lap 18 km outing together. She enjoys the team adventure but describes tiring, increasingly muddy footing on lap two, modest finish refreshments and outdoor showers. She praises the absence of timing pressure.
Complete original first-person club account, published 17 September 2017 and referring to the previous day. The opening calls it Dark Wolf, but the title, Remsfeld/Böser Wolf venue, 18 km course and organizer link match Bad Wolf. It is one shared account, not two independent reviews. No finish time or score is supplied.
Frankenberg running group (posted by TSVAXELADMIN) · 2019
Obstacle
Eight club runners finish about 9 km together, helping one another through natural terrain and built obstacles. The report praises the varied course, mud and relaxed team experience; it ends with waiting for a very cold shower.
Complete original club report published 26 September 2019; exact raced day is unstated. The approximate 9 km group finish is explicit. One containing account represents eight named-as-a-group runners, not eight independent authors. Its participant-count estimate is not used as an official denominator. No numerical score is given.
Zimmermann describes a positive, demanding day with two colleagues after their mutual friend withdraws before the race. He likes the staggered starts, organization and varied hills, mud, water and food/drink stations.
Complete original first-person account on the author’s commercial coaching site. Exact raced year and his own completed distance are unstated; the general 9/18 km explanation is not proof of an 18 km finish. His injured friend did not start. The page promotes his coaching/newsletter; no complimentary-entry disclosure is found. No overall numerical score is supplied.
Opinions range from a wish to return to a firm refusal. Tamara enjoyed the marathon but criticizes contradictory route instructions; Jan dislikes the obstacles, atmosphere, warm-up and refreshments. Jakob praises the woodland setting, creative obstacles, check-in and short queues, while wanting better showers and another aid station.
Native Trophy Runners 3.0/5 from three complete cards, read in the actual 28 April 2025 original-page archive capture after the live page returned 404. All three explicitly report participation in 2016: Tamara describes a nominal marathon, Jakob 18 km, and Jan leaves the entered distance unstated. The displayed three-, one- and five-star cards and five-point aggregate were checked in the rendered original. Native aggregate retained without calculating a replacement. Exact posting dates, raced days, measured distances, full obstacle completion, reviewer identities and independent-athlete count remain unverified. These historical opinions do not assess the separate advertised September 2023 programme or any future course; the platform’s 2025 event date is not primary-confirmed here. One containing native section, not three source URLs; Jakob’s companion’s shorter race and photographs are not additional reviews.
Participants praise enjoyable obstacles, scenery and atmosphere, while some criticize signage, registration/helpfulness, changing facilities, supplies and value. A 2021 first-timer specifically thanks the team for holding the event under pandemic uncertainty; other reviews are substantially more critical.
Complete text of all cards across the full exposed two-page pagination read, including score-only cards. All twelve original cards across both pages read, posted 2017–2021. They mix positive first-time/pandemic-era experiences with criticism of route marking, missing advertised features, supplies, shirt availability and value. Exact individual raced distances are mostly unstated. Anonymous/aliased identities and completion are not independently verified. Historical Podersdorf beach-event context, not a review of Vienna or an unannounced future Podersdorf edition. One containing platform sequence, not a count of independent athletes. No present-day logistics are established by these old opinions.
Iris enjoyed her first obstacle race and found most obstacles manageable after initial hesitation. A muddy container exit was especially difficult. She slipped near the final obstacle, reached the finish and describes receiving prompt medical help; she still wanted to return for longer races.
Complete original first-person narrative and conclusion read. Explicit 9 September 2017 Podersdorf, 5 km, first OCR. Her fall and treatment are historical self-reported observations, not an independently investigated safety finding or a current-course claim. She discusses her sister and friend but those are not additional independent accounts. Personal running/lifestyle blog; gifted entry or sponsorship is unverified. No numerical overall score.
Reinisch describes a cold, windy outing with four friends, a motivating warm-up, well-spaced muddy obstacles and useful snack/water stops. She enjoyed finishing together and wanted to return.
Complete original signed article, published 25 October 2022. The author identifies herself as RETTER Sports’ fitness expert, describes that year’s 5 km/fifteen-obstacle experience and briefly recalls first attending Vienna in 2019. Exact raced day and venue are unstated, so it is not independently tied to the club’s Krieau outing. Publisher/employer affiliation is explicit; entry/travel funding is unstated. The author and her four friends are one containing account, not five independent reviews. No numerical satisfaction score is given, and her broad claims about who can complete the event are not adopted as advice. Photographs are unread and not reused.
The club’s ten-person team describes water, mud, a slippery ramp, foam and slides over 5 km. They enjoyed helping one another and finishing together, while finding it difficult to keep warm.
The complete relevant Muddy Angel section of the original club archive identifies 17 September 2022, Trabrennbahn Krieau and 5 km/fifteen obstacles. Other archive races are not claimed read. This is a collective club account; ten team members are not ten independent reviews, and claimed elapsed time/finishing status are not independently verified. Entry funding and individual obstacle completion are unstated. No numerical score is inferred; the linked photo gallery is unread.
The 16 km finisher enjoys the event, weather and his 1:31:36 result, while reporting only six shower heads for an estimated 1,400 muddy runners.
Complete original club article read, published 12 September 2011 and describing the preceding Saturday. Accept one short directly quoted participant account, not the narrator’s firsthand finish or a second source for his teammate. Crowd/shower counts are the athlete’s estimates. Historical 16 km experience; no overall numerical score.
The writer enjoys a varied course that increases in difficulty and finishes with a swim, with a non-swimmer alternative. Their relaxed group encounters obstacle queues after starting further back, then uses hot outdoor showers.
Complete original first-person account published 19 September 2013. The writer explicitly thanks Puma for the blogger event and describes lodge accommodation and dinner with its staff; the exact payment arrangements are unstated. Although 8/16 km were offered, the narrator’s actual distance and swim-versus-bypass choice are unconfirmed. Commercial clothing-store blog. No numerical overall score.
The writer and girlfriend run two 8 km laps and enjoy an approachable obstacle race. They describe arrival traffic, missing shirt sizes followed by replacements, less interesting repeated laps and difficulty overtaking slower groups. They value the scenery and generally good organization.
Complete original first-person sixth-edition report, originally published September 2015 and modified in 2021. Actual stated distance is 16 km; the precise race day/time and complete obstacle performance are unstated. The blog sells training products and explicitly earns commissions from gear affiliate links; race entry compensation is unknown. Personal safety/training opinions are not independently verified advice. No overall numerical score.
cairnter2 and INTJ_Linguaphile on r/Winnipeg · 2022
Obstacle
One participant describes the 2022 event as poorly assembled and repetitive, with mud pits dominating the course. Another enjoyed earlier years but found 2022 disappointing, citing fewer obstacles and missing timing, photography and group-start atmosphere.
The complete relevant original thread and comments were read through the related-post boundary using the original web reader. Only direct 2022 participant comments are accepted here; the opening author registered for a later postponed event. Entered 6/10 km course, finish, individual identities and entry funding are unverified. Older 2017–2019 praise lacks a verified venue/course match. One containing thread, not one review per commenter. Quoted external C. Cook / Nova Scotia reviews, corporate-licensing speculation, campground comments and refund/legal advice are excluded. No numerical score is supplied; votes are not ratings.
Moore praises the revised natural-terrain obstacles, energetic event and course monitoring. He describes extensive mud, cold overnight conditions and a demanding final obstacle sequence. His own participation included two early laps, a long rest, a personal log-carry lap and a final lap, rather than continuous racing for 24 hours.
Complete original report read, including the conclusion and commercial coaching/discount promotion. Moore runs One Moore Rep, staffed a coaching presence and had clients competing; this is an affiliated participant account. It concerns the rescheduled June 2022 Dargle Farm event and approximately 10–11 km laps. Flood damage and other athletes’ experiences are secondhand where the writer says so, and are not separately verified claims. No numerical score, future course equivalence or current safety assurance is inferred.
Hunter enjoys the valley trails, obstacles built into natural rock and encouragement from obstacle volunteers. He describes the pit crew’s importance, overnight fatigue, a short sleep and changing temperatures, reporting a solo win after fourteen nominal 11 km laps.
Complete original report read, including its closing comments. The narrative explicitly dates the race 6–7 March 2021. A winner’s performance is not a typical finisher benchmark, and reported laps are not independently measured distance here. The publisher sells running gear, nutrition and coaching; the report links commercial products, and the organizer identifies Hunter elsewhere as a Run Vault coach/co-owner. Historical 2021 experience, not the June 2022 course or a future edition. No numerical score is supplied; republished versions of this same account are one source.
The organizer’s archive lists a full marathon for March 12, 2022. The current race offers only 5, 10 and 17 miles; its 2026 date does not identify a full marathon. The final year a full marathon was held is unconfirmed. Historical shorter-distance feedback stays event context.
Vila liked the wooded course and found the event well organized, despite struggling personally. She describes muddy sections and a long pre-race restroom queue, and appreciated other runners slowing to encourage her.
A March 2019 ten-mile account from a year when trail closures moved the race to Bur-Mil Park. It concerns a shorter historical course. The organizer changed the event to 5, 10 and 17 miles for 2025 and retains those options in 2026; this is not evidence of a current full marathon. No organizer affiliation is stated.
Roger Schuler, guest blogger for the Luzern regional tourism blog · 2020
Obstacle
Schuler returns after 2019 and reports finishing the adult Singles outing in 51 minutes alongside two relatives. He finds the route shorter than the previous year but demanding, with climbs, carries, crawling and a water trench. The lack of spectators and food stalls diminishes the atmosphere, although he wants to return.
Complete original signed guest article read; published 28 October 2020 in the source index and explicitly describing the rescheduled 18 October event. The organizer advertises about 6.6 km, but the writer does not measure or state his own exact distance. The reported joint 51-minute finish is not independently verified and does not prove every obstacle was cleared. His relatives are companions, not two additional review sources; the children’s separate Toddler outings are not adult-course feedback. Personal family medical details are omitted. This is a tourism-blog guest contribution; entry funding and other compensation are unstated. The original photo gallery is not claimed viewed, and no numerical score is inferred.
Writers praise the dense, demanding obstacles, helpers, refreshments, atmosphere and value of the historical four-hour Sprint. One asks for fewer walls, more obstacle variation, longer running sections and photography. Several comments compare the timed outing with the separate March Dirtrun or discuss Celtic races generally.
Historical 2017 four-hour Celtic Sprint feedback on the platform page now titled Zillingtaler Celtic 8H. All 36 cards are posted in August/September 2017, and explicit four-hour/prologue comments align with the organizer’s 19 August 2017 history. Many cards give only scores or generic praise; exact laps, attendance and independent authorship are unverified. This is not a rating of the 2020 eight-hour edition or the Donnerskirchen venue. October 2025 edit dates are not race dates.
Kevin Schuon, interviewed by Mareike Kratt for WALDRAUSCH
Obstacle
Kevin enjoyed trying obstacle racing and wanted another outing. He found obstacle queues frustrating because they spoiled his time target, while valuing the experience itself and the chance to test his limits.
Complete original interview published 28 November 2018 read through its conclusion. It explicitly identifies his Grafenhausen self-test, but exact raced year/day and entered one/two-lap distance are unstated. The article’s general 8 km/two-loop description is not his verified distance. Reporter/employer feature with entry funding unknown; not an independent sample of multiple athletes. His description of a push-up alternative does not establish which obstacles he personally completed or bypassed. Training advice, universal suitability claims, linked magazine/video and images are not adopted; no numerical score is supplied. The appended preliminary 2019 Erlichsee date is superseded by the original organizer’s later change notice.
SC Biel-Benken active team, unsigned collective narrator · 2019
Obstacle
The club team remembers the event fondly and describes creative obstacles redesigned each year. Nine members race in three teams, alternating laps during the 90-minute relay; their teams finish second, third and fourth in the adult men’s category.
Complete original first-person collective report visually read at physical page 1; organizer adult results visually checked at page 3. The 10 August date is explicit and 2019 is established by the containing archive identifier and original results. Chosen adult 90-minute format is explicit; lap length, individual distances and complete obstacle performance are unstated. Three teams are not three independently read reports. Same club, one containing PDF/URL, compensation unknown; no numerical satisfaction score in this account.
A 2019 team account praises the varied course and marshals but criticizes slide queues, changing space and showers. One other card offers very brief praise; two give scores without reasons.
All four complete cards read, posted in July 2017, July 2018 and July 2019. Schaffer explicitly titles the team account 14 July 2019 and praises course variety and marshals while reporting slide queues, missing changing space and only two working shower heads. Other cards are brief or score-only. Exact individual distances and distinct identities are unverified. Historical Goldbach family; no present course or amenities inferred. The native five-point overall aggregate is retained directly; October 2025 edit stamps are not raced dates. No topic or visible-card mean is substituted.
stayfithavefun (full individual name unstated) · 2017
Obstacle
The first-time participant finds the steep motocross terrain much harder than expected, needs encouragement and physical help, and enjoys the hay-bale pyramid. After recovering, they consider returning to the 10 km event.
Complete original post read, published 19 July 2017 and describing day three after the outing; its separate preview identifies 16 July. The writer describes their 10 km, with help pulling and pushing; the teammate’s two laps/20 km are not the writer’s distance. Own time and every-obstacle outcome are unstated. Participant-count claims are not independently verified. Entry funding and commercial ties unstated. The 2018 preview concerns nonattendance and is not a second finisher review. Photos and video are not claimed viewed; no numerical score inferred.
Historical comments differ on obstacle variety and value: one finds the installations weak and unchanged, while another enjoys the challenge but considers it expensive. Several entries contain only scores.
Seven native cards posted in 2017/2018 at Neue Bult, before the 2019 summer programme. Exact raced editions, distances and independent identities are unverified. Repeated Guest aliases do not establish seven independent finishers; later page edits do not date an outing.
The writer finishes 12 km in roughly an hour and a half during the hot summer edition. He likes parking, short walks and the start-stall setting, finds the obstacles moderately varied, and enjoys cooling off in ice water. Rope/hanging obstacles and the high tower provide challenges.
Complete original first-person account. Publication on 5 August and later update are not race dates; the original organizer confirms 29 June 2019. Approximately 30°C and the writer’s near fall on a hidden branch are historical personal conditions. His experience does not rate the earlier winter course or a future edition. No numerical overall score.
The club presents its Horb outing as a successful team challenge centered on fun and cooperation. Its five runners describe crossing the Neckar, pulling truck tyres, hanging, mud sections and a quarter-pipe before enjoying the finish together.
Complete original Mudiator section of the club’s 2019 archive read; unrelated annual reports and photo galleries are not claimed read. It explicitly identifies 22 June in Horb and reports nominal 10 km/twenty-five obstacles without independent measurement or each member’s class. Team finish is the club’s claim, not proof that every obstacle was cleared by everyone. One collective club account, not five reviews or an independent-athlete count. A recollection of racing three years earlier does not verify that older venue/course. Entry funding is unstated, and no numerical satisfaction score is supplied.