Find your next race

ergeko (public Steemit handle; full name unstated) · 2017

Obstacle

The first-time obstacle runner reports a 10 km Urban Challenge with twenty obstacles, including a high halfpipe, hanging traverse and sandbag carries. The experience leaves them eager to try another event.

Complete original Steemit post and its six displayed comments read; published metadata is 6 September 2017. The author says ten days earlier, which is not used to assign an exact raced day. They describe their own 10 km Hamburg outing; other general distance/price examples and borrowed source images are not separate race experiences. Own time, every-obstacle completion and independently verified finish are unstated. Steemit displays author rewards; race-entry funding and brand relationships are unstated. The Ecency discovery page is a redisplay of this same post, not a second account. Photos and audio were not viewed or played, and no numerical satisfaction rating is inferred.

Hizami Li · 2016

Obstacle

Hizami enjoyed his first obstacle event and was excited to reach the finish and earn a medal. He found the hills demanding, skipped several grip or group obstacles, and both enjoyed the experience and had expected more from it.

Complete original Malay post read; this paraphrase retains translation uncertainty. It describes the Saturday before its August 2016 post and nominal 10 km/fifteen obstacles, matched to the separately verified 20 August Ranch programme. Resorts World Genting provided his hotel stay; race-entry funding is unstated. The Awana lodging is not the race venue. He entered with Neyra, sometimes hesitated to join larger groups, and explicitly skipped obstacles. One report, not two athletes. Comments, Instagram media and photos are unread. No numerical score is supplied, and his upcoming Sepang recommendation is not a review of that future event.

Jonathan Nyst and Norazlan Rabani, published by Miera Nadhirah · 2017

Obstacle

First-timer Jonathan Nyst found Wheel of Fortune particularly demanding even as a fitness trainer and valued the challenge. Returning participant Norazlan Rabani enjoyed the cooler setting and teamwork, and was pleased with his group’s improving completion time.

The complete relevant original 23 July 2017 article and its two attributed exchanges were read through the empty comment section before later reader failures. It explicitly identifies The Ranch, 15 July, 10 km and sixteen obstacles. It is a selected release-style interview source, not the blogger’s verified personal race; funding and selection independence are unknown. One containing account, not one per speaker or teammate. A broken/duplicated paragraph is not reconstructed beyond its clear statements, and reported elapsed time is not a rating. Photos and footage are unread. No numerical score, independent finish verification or later course assessment is inferred.

HDsports contributors

Obstacle

Flachau-specific comments praise the mountain setting and atmosphere, while some criticize fees, organization and the closed waterslide. A 2017 writer identifies a fourth visit. Several other cards provide only scores.

All nine native cards were read. This containing summary excludes the explicit old Obertauern account and does not assign the mixed 4.3/9 aggregate or a recomputed eight-card mean. Remaining comments posted in 2017/2018 have generally unknown raced days and distances; repeated aliases do not establish independent athletes.

OCR for Fun · 2017

Obstacle

The writer chooses the nominal 10 km and finishes in under two hours, reporting 9.44 km on their GPS. They enjoy the region, downhill slide and cold water but encounter mass-start queues, find the obstacles too easy, and miss the closed major waterslide.

Complete original first-person report posted 16 November 2017; exact raced day is unstated. The 20 km explanation is not proof of a two-lap finish. GPS distance and differing approximate ascent figures are not certified course measurements. No free-entry disclosure is found on this source; the complimentary entry disclosed in the author’s separate Celtic report is not assumed here. No overall score.

Petra Sobinger / be-outdoor.de · 2017

Obstacle

Sobinger describes sustained uphill running, mountain views, climbing obstacles and useful refreshment stops, followed by a descent and closely spaced walls, nets, mud and cold water near the finish. She says the team had great fun and wanted to enter again.

Original report published 14 July 2017, signed by Petra Sobinger and describing two members of the publisher’s team taking part. It reports 9.4 km, about 380 m ascent and fourteen obstacles; the host tourism board advertised 9.2 km per lap. The report describes its own course experience but gives no numerical satisfaction score or exact race day, and does not establish every obstacle was cleared. Publisher participation and the site’s advertising context are disclosed; entry/travel funding is unstated. One containing account, not two independent reviews. The linked photo gallery is unread and no photographs are reused.

Action Magazine editorial participant (unnamed) · 2015

Obstacle

The writer enjoys the playful costumes, helping other runners and enthusiastic Bibione spectators during the 10.5 km outing. Sand makes the course tiring, with two waist-deep sea passages. They discuss choosing water-draining shoes for the mixed surface.

Complete original first-person account, published 18 May 2015 and explicitly describing Saturday 9 May. The stated 10.5 km course is historical, not the later 10 km night route. The editorial article promotes forthcoming races and discusses a previously tested Columbia shoe; free entry or product compensation is unverified. No finish time or overall numerical score is supplied.

Michele Scaggiante · 2016

Obstacle

Scaggiante finishes the two-lap 10 km Sprint in about 1:25. His first lap is slow and crowded, with more room to run on lap two. He describes sand, sea, nets, foam and a final slippery tyre climb, then finish refreshments and returning the timing chip for his shirt.

Complete original signed first-person club report, posted 22 May 2016 and titled for the previous day. The account describes an actual 10 km finish, unlike the later directory’s 16 km label. Its crowd estimate is not an official denominator. No numerical overall score or compensation disclosure is supplied.

John Teh · 2015

Obstacle

John enjoyed the inventive obstacles, muddy terrain and cooperation among strangers. Queues slowed the later stages and the group walked much of the remaining course. He describes failed obstacles, including his monkey-ring attempt and the final ramp, yet felt glad to have tried his first event of this kind.

Complete original narrative read through its conclusion and video introduction, separately from recommended articles. It explicitly identifies Sepang and March 2015, reporting about 21 km/twenty-two obstacles without independent measurements; exact raced day is unstated. The displayed 30 March 2015 date conflicts with prose saying it was written years later, so actual publication date is unresolved. Assistance, failures and walking are preserved; not all obstacles were cleared. One team report, not six reviews. Funding is unknown, and personal medical details are omitted. Photos/video are unread; no numerical score is given. This is not the November 2016 route.

Jonathan Chen / Scream at my face · 2016

Obstacle

Chen’s original graphic gives 76/100. He enjoys forest, river and trench obstacles and helpful marshals, while criticizing cold-water effects, slippery logs and the arrangement of showers, changing and parking.

Complete original post and score graphic read: 5 November 2016 at 13:20, nominal 10 km. The graphic date governs over its misleading 161112 filename. His finish time and full obstacle record are unstated; the employer team’s earlier wave and time are not his. Stanford Hall identity is independently verified. The author’s original May 2016 methodology explicitly establishes 100 points and revises earlier graphics. This is one historical individual assessment; no topic average or conversion to stars. Entry funding is unknown. Other photos and videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.

Brad Goldsmith, quoted by employer Premier · 2016

Obstacle

Goldsmith describes a team finish just over two hours, supportive teamwork, good organization and atmosphere, with cold-water partitions particularly demanding. He wanted to return.

Complete original employer report read. It identifies Stanford Hall, 5–6 November 2016, approximately 10 km and a Saturday 10:30 wave. This is one selected quotation/report, not twelve independent reviews. Goldsmith is Premier’s marketing executive and team captain; employer fundraising and promotional selection are explicit, entry funding unknown. No numerical satisfaction score, full obstacle record or Chen finish time is inferred. Other images are not claimed viewed.

Stephen Jones / Cool As Leicester · 2016

Obstacle

Jones enjoys the demanding muddy winter course, volunteers, organization and finisher shirt. He describes a finish, cold-water challenges and failed monkey bars, and would return.

Complete signed original report read, published 22 November 2016. Winter Wolf 2016, Stanford Hall and approximately 10 km are explicit; he reports Saturday’s 10:00 first wave, without an exact raced date or time result. Failed monkey bars remain explicit. The publisher asked him to review the event; entry funding is unstated. Participant counts and temperatures are attributed observations, not verified measurements. No satisfaction number is inferred. Embedded video and other photos are not claimed viewed.

Aaron G and Chris / Let’s Do This

Obstacle

Two native five-star cards praise organization, a challenging course and encouragement, and advise dry warm clothes afterward. One writer discusses both Autumn and Winter.

Native historical Winter Wolf aggregate, 5/5 from two complete cards labeled 2019 and 2017. Aaron G discusses Autumn and Winter together; Chris gives brief winter clothing advice. Exact raced days, individual distances and complete obstacle results are unstated. The listing’s 2021 date is not the cards’ edition or a current-course guarantee. One page, not a verified independent-finisher census. Chen’s separate 2016 76/100 is retained without averaging.

Jonathan Chen / Scream at my face · 2016

Obstacle

The writer enjoys a free extra 5 km before joining friends for the booked 10 km, praises the obstacles and marshals, and questions the price. The graphic gives 88/100 overall.

Original graphic: 88 overall, 18 September 2016 at 10:30, nominal 10 km at Clapham Common. The writer reports a paid £63.65 booked event and an organizer-offered extra 5 km race for free, followed by the slower group 10 km. They praise obstacles, marshals and the Travelator, while questioning price. Direct organizer feedback and the free additional race are explicit. Own finish times and all obstacle outcomes are unstated. The author’s original 21 May 2016 post explicitly establishes a 100-point scale and says earlier events were updated. The revised graphic’s published number is retained directly out of 100, without multiplying an old prose mark or averaging topic bars. The full original post and graphic were read; this is one historical author assessment, not an athlete aggregate or current-course guarantee. Entry funding and unreported completion details remain unknown; other gallery images and videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.

TaleOfTwoRuns (publishing account) · 2016

Obstacle

The writer enjoys a first obstacle race with a friend, describing 10 km, 15 obstacles, failed water obstacles and repeated Travelator attempts before finishing. Registration is quick and the medal doubles as a bottle opener.

Complete original first-person recap read, published 19 September 2016. Clapham Common and 2016 are explicit; the exact raced day is unstated here. The author discloses complimentary entry. An uncertain “about 1:20 mins” is not standardized into a verified finish time. Failed obstacles, water falls and retries remain explicit. One publishing-account review, not multiple independent athletes because friends appear; individual full byline not established. No numerical satisfaction overall. Photos/video not claimed viewed.

Kristina Samoylova interviewing five named SMTL adult teachers · 2016

Obstacle

The teachers describe a demanding but enjoyable team outing, with carrying, crawling, water and climbing obstacles. They praise the camaraderie and organization; one also criticizes the closed start area and difficulty finding water before running. Teammates and an instructor helped, and only three team members were said to clear the final inclined obstacle.

November 2016 school newspaper, issue 2 of 2016/2017, pages 6–8 and 10. Student interviewer Kristina Samoylova quotes adult teachers Dmitry Matkov, Igor Minaev, Sergey Selichev, Mikhail Shutko and Boris Yudin. They describe the ordinary 20 August 2016 Roshchinsky 8 km team wave and explicitly did not enter the next day’s qualifier. Teammates and an instructor assisted, and some obstacles were bypassed; reaching the finish does not establish an all-obstacle completion. Their reported 14th of 107 and approximate times are race results. One institution-published interview, with entry funding unstated; future winter intentions are not a winter race review.

Manuela Barbieri, Running Magazine · 2016

Obstacle

Barbieri finishes the two-lap 10 km Sprint in 1:18:11 with two StrongWIR companions. Her first obstacle race is tiring and scratches her legs, but she enjoys the costumes, laughter and mutual help through mud, water, hay, tyres and foam.

Complete original one-page participant report, physical/printed page 25 of Running Magazine issue 6/2016, visually read with all columns and captions. It explicitly describes 11 June and eighteen obstacle passages. Her reported finish is separate from the race winner’s time. The magazine promotes OCR and names event sponsors/ANSA imagery; no free-entry or payment disclosure is found. The nearby women’s-rugby quotation and other athletes are not additional independent source units. No numerical overall score.

Jonathan Chen / Scream at my face · 2016

Obstacle

Chen’s original graphic gives 75/100. He enjoys the inflatables, warm-up energy and access, but wants more physical challenge and colour powder, a shorter warm-up, better finisher items and changing facilities.

Complete original short post and score graphic read: 28 May 2016 at 10:00, nominal 5 km. The same author’s original 2016 roundup explicitly identifies Kempton Park. Finish time and every-obstacle completion are unstated. The separate platform listing has no reviews. The author’s original May 2016 methodology explicitly establishes 100 points and revises earlier graphics. This is one historical individual assessment; no topic average or conversion to stars. Entry funding is unknown. Other photos and videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.

Jonathan Chen / Scream at my face · 2016

Obstacle

The author enjoys a varied set of obstacles, enthusiastic volunteers and value at £30, while preferring closer obstacle spacing and criticizing queues, bag-drop organization and expensive race photos. The original graphic gives 85/100.

Original post and graphic identify the 21 May 2016 09:30 London outing, a nominal 10 km assessment and 5 km loop. The post itself explicitly establishes the hundred-point scale. Own finish time, lap count and every-obstacle outcome are unstated. Its positive assessment and price comment are personal historical opinions, not confirmation of later event safety or current service. Complete original post and linked graphic read. The author explicitly establishes a hundred-point scale and updates earlier graphics; the displayed number is retained directly, without topic averaging or conversion to stars. One historical author assessment, with entry funding unstated unless disclosed. Other photographs and embedded videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.

Jonathan Chen / Scream at my face · 2016

Obstacle

The writer likes the Olympic Park location, obstacles and included photos, but criticizes a moved wave, heavy carry and the village closing. The original graphic gives 80/100 overall.

Original graphic: 80 overall, 9 April 2016 at 16:20, Sprint labelled 5 km at Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park. The post has only a title/date and event link; its full participant assessment is in the original graphic. The writer describes obstacles, praises location and included photos, and criticizes a shifted wave, heavy carry and the village packing up. No personal measured time or complete obstacle/penalty record is supplied. The venue advertised 3–5 miles, and another participant describes 7 km. The author’s original 21 May 2016 post explicitly establishes a 100-point scale and says earlier events were updated. The revised graphic’s published number is retained directly out of 100, without multiplying an old prose mark or averaging topic bars. The full original post and graphic were read; this is one historical author assessment, not an athlete aggregate or current-course guarantee. Entry funding and unreported completion details remain unknown; other gallery images and videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.

Holly Worthington / Obstacle Racing Media · 2016

Obstacle

Worthington praises easy access, registration, encouraging volunteers, varied carries and the finish atmosphere. She reports a 1:31:24 finish after a failed spear throw and 30 burpees, while finding less mud than she prefers.

Complete original named first-person report read, published 20 April for 9 April 2016 at Olympic Park. She calls the Sprint 7 km, versus the other graphic’s 5 km and venue’s 3–5 miles. Reported time and spear penalty remain explicit; neither becomes a rating. One account, not two because a companion finishes with her. Media host and unknown entry funding disclosed. Child-race observations and Allianz Park comparisons are not separate adult reviews; photos/videos not claimed viewed.

Wani / Wani Writes · 2016

Obstacle

Wani strongly criticizes the last-wave experience: unclear directions, obstacle queues, loose or broken equipment, early removal of markers and closed refreshment stalls. She also reports bag-collection confusion, limited water and unsuitable remaining shirt sizes. Companionship was the main positive, and she did not want to return.

Complete signed original entry and its displayed comment section read. Published 28 January 2016, it describes the preceding weekend’s nominal 10 km Sentosa outing; the exact 23 January day comes from the separate published Viper programme. The author and team skipped obstacles because of queues or equipment concerns and made detours, so complete obstacle performance is not claimed. Estimated elapsed time is not a satisfaction score. Entry funding is unstated; photos credited to Neville Teo are unread and not reused. Companions add no independent reviews, and the future Spartan recommendation is not a review of that future event. This historical account does not assess Kallang or later Sentosa courses.

Jonathan Chen / Scream at my face · 2015

Obstacle

The author enjoys ExCeL’s accessible aquatic 10 km, new inflatables and the jump, but finds the queues worse than in 2014. The graphic gives 81/100 overall.

Original 2015 graphic: 81 overall, 25 July at 11:00, nominal 10 km at ExCeL. The short original post and complete graphic form one participant account. The author likes aquatic obstacles and venue access but reports more queues and a 4.99% administration fee. The same author’s 2014 score of 90 is retained in that year’s written context without averaging or counting a second independent athlete. Finish time and every-obstacle completion in 2015 are unstated. The author’s original 21 May 2016 post explicitly establishes a 100-point scale and says earlier events were updated. The revised graphic’s published number is retained directly out of 100, without multiplying an old prose mark or averaging topic bars. The full original post and graphic were read; this is one historical author assessment, not an athlete aggregate or current-course guarantee. Entry funding and unreported completion details remain unknown; other gallery images and videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.

Jonathan Chen / Scream at my face · 2014

Obstacle

The writer enjoys two laps of varied aquatic obstacles, kayaking and a high jump, and praises registration and transport. They question event/photo prices and the timing pauses. The original graphic gives 90/100 overall on the author’s stated scale.

Complete original first-person text and linked graphic read. The graphic identifies 16 August 2014, ExCeL, 10 km and 90/100 overall. The writer reports a 90-minute finish excluding clocked-out obstacle periods, not a continuous elapsed result. One four-person team account, not four independent athlete reviews; assistance and every-obstacle completion are not established. The same author’s later 2015 score is displayed separately without averaging. Compensation unstated. Other photos/video not claimed viewed; the article’s general training advice is not imported. The original author’s May 2016 scale statement confirms revised earlier graphics use 100 points. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.

Jack Sexty / 220 Triathlon · 2015

Obstacle

Sexty enjoys the inclusive atmosphere and varied aquatic course, but struggles with kayaking and wet monkey bars. He reports a 58-minute finish and praises competitors helping one another over the final walls.

Complete original staff-writer participant report read. The introduction identifies 25 July 2015 at ExCeL and a nominal 10 km course with 35 obstacles. The reported 58-minute finish includes missed monkey bars and only almost all obstacles completed; no flawless result or satisfaction score is inferred. Media affiliation, Shelter-supplied photos and unknown entry funding disclosed. Not the author’s 50-minute observation of another runner. Images/videos not claimed viewed, and exercise/medical generalizations are excluded.

TrailsandAdventures (publishing account) · 2015

Obstacle

The writer enjoys the high slide, canoe section and waterside obstacles, finishes after help at the monkey bars and falling from a floating tube, and praises visible marshals and water support.

Complete original first-person ExCeL report read, published 17 August 2015. The account distinguishes London from Stockton but does not establish its exact raced day, measured distance or time. Finish, assistance and water fall are reported; no perfect obstacle outcome is inferred. Publishing account lacks an individual full byline here and compensation is unknown. Weather and water comments are personal impressions, not current safety claims. One source unit, no numerical overall. Photos and embedded videos not claimed viewed.

Jonathan Chen / Scream at my face · 2015

Obstacle

The author enjoys the obstacles, penalty incentive, dry course and included photos, but finds the Sprint short for its price and questions penalty monitoring. The revised graphic gives 90/100.

Original post and revised graphic identify Allianz Park on 16 May 2015, 12:30, nominal Sprint 5 km and 90/100. The short prose mentions the outing; most assessment is in the graphic. Own finish time, completed penalties and every-obstacle outcome are unstated. Its thirty-burpee description differs from another participant’s ten-burpee report, so no common rule is invented. Complete original post and linked graphic read. The author explicitly establishes a hundred-point scale and updates earlier graphics; the displayed number is retained directly, without topic averaging or conversion to stars. One historical author assessment, with entry funding unstated unless disclosed. Other photographs and embedded videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.

Nick Hutchings / Coach · 2015

Obstacle

Hutchings enjoys the short, largely dry obstacle race and its strength tasks, but encounters queues and slow stadium stair carries. He reports a 45:56 finish after a missed spear throw and ten burpees.

Complete original named media participant report read, published 10 June 2015. Allianz Park and nominal 5 km are explicit; exact own raced day is unstated. His reported 45:56 includes a spear-failure ten-burpee penalty, which differs from the score author’s thirty-burpee description. No current rule or satisfaction number is inferred. Media affiliation and unknown entry funding disclosed; own account is one review. Photos and videos are not claimed viewed.

Justin, Fitness Superstore Leeds manager · 2015

Obstacle

Justin praises organization, spectators, varied obstacles and the demanding stadium stairs, describing a finish and wanting to continue toward a Trifecta. He promotes the equipment used in training and a Spartan discount.

Complete original first-person commercial-host report read, published 26 June 2015. Allianz Park, nominal 5 km and a finish are explicit; exact raced day, time and full obstacle/penalty record are unstated. The Leeds store-manager role, equipment promotion, Spartan Street Team involvement and 20% discount are openly disclosed. Entry funding remains unknown. Not commercially independent, an athlete aggregate or a numerical rating. Child-race observations and family mentions are not extra adult reviews; images not claimed viewed.

Jonathan Chen / Scream at my face · 2015

Obstacle

The author enjoys unusual obstacles and a Tame time trial after practice, while finding some Insane drops too risky, several tasks unsuitable for their height and the safety mats unconvincing. They paid £19 using a voucher.

Original revised graphic gives 90/100 for the 4 May 2015 Tooting Bec 09:30, 100 m obstacle event. The writer explicitly races the Tame course, tries some Insane obstacles, skips others and fails several attempts. A Tame medal is described, without an independently verified time or complete Insane result. The graphic discloses a £19 voucher price versus £60 full price; the 100 m label is not a surveyed distance. Complete original post and linked graphic read. The author explicitly establishes a hundred-point scale and updates earlier graphics; the displayed number is retained directly, without topic averaging or conversion to stars. One historical author assessment, with entry funding unstated unless disclosed. Other photographs and embedded videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.

Jonathan Chen / Scream at my face · 2014

Obstacle

The author likes Wembley’s access, varied obstacles, river use and the finisher package, but criticizes group-booking charges, crowded changing space and a chaotic bag drop. They need assistance on the third high wall.

Original revised graphic gives 90/100 for 22 November 2014, nominal 10 km. The post dated 23 November identifies Wembley and the chosen 10 km option. Assistance on one wall and a missed basketball task remain explicit. No personal finish time or flawless obstacle result is established; friends’ complaints about other editions are context, not extra independent reviews. Complete original post and linked graphic read. The author explicitly establishes a hundred-point scale and updates earlier graphics; the displayed number is retained directly, without topic averaging or conversion to stars. One historical author assessment, with entry funding unstated unless disclosed. Other photographs and embedded videos are not claimed viewed. Authorship is resolved as Jonathan Chen by the signed original site launch, personal roundup and own infographic-method statement.

Wiener Läufer

Obstacle

The writer enjoys the mountain scenery, aid stations and waterslide during an old two-lap 20 km Obertauern outing. They find the terrain more demanding than the obstacles and describe a smaller event field.

Individual review by Wiener Läufer, titled Meine Bewertung von der alten Location in Obertauern, posted 6 November 2019 on the Flachau-titled native page. The author explicitly describes an old Obertauern 20 km/two-lap outing, but its raced year is unknown. This is one author’s native Gesamtbewertung, not the contaminated 4.3/9 page aggregate; an Obertauern aggregate denominator and author independence are unknown.